{"id":1076,"date":"2013-09-26T15:44:06","date_gmt":"2013-09-26T22:44:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/?page_id=1076"},"modified":"2017-02-09T22:11:39","modified_gmt":"2017-02-09T22:11:39","slug":"appendices","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/appendices\/","title":{"rendered":"Appendices"},"content":{"rendered":"

Appendices<\/h3>\n

Appendix 1: Columbia Basin Map<\/h3>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

View a larger version<\/a>\u00a0(Control\/Right click link to download)<\/p>\n

Download a PDF version<\/a>\u00a0(Control\/Right click link to download)<\/p>\n

Appendix 2: Columbia Basin Major Community Profiles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Communities<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Pop. 2011 Census<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Pop. 2006 Census<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

CRT Review events<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dates (attendance)<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Economic Activity<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Kinbasket Reservoir<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Golden<\/td>\n3,701<\/td>\n3,811<\/td>\nJune 19, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (60)<\/strong>Nov 21, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (49)<\/strong>Mar 20, 2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (40)<\/strong><\/td>\nForestry, public sector, tourism, construction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Valemount<\/td>\n1,020<\/td>\n1,018<\/td>\nJune 13,\u00a0 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (25)<\/strong>Nov 22, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (19)<\/strong><\/td>\nForestry, public sector, tourism<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Upper Columbia River \u2013 Columbia Lake<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canal Flats<\/td>\n715<\/td>\n700<\/td>\n<\/td>\nForestry, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Invermere<\/td>\n2,955<\/td>\n3,002<\/td>\n<\/td>\nTourism, public sector, forestry, mining, construction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Radium Hot Springs<\/td>\n777<\/td>\n735<\/td>\n<\/td>\nTourism, public sector, construction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mid-Columbia River<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Revelstoke<\/td>\n7,139<\/td>\n7,230<\/td>\nJune 20, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (35)<\/strong>Nov 20, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (8)<\/strong><\/td>\nPublic sector, forestry, goods and services<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Arrow Lakes Reservoir<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Nakusp<\/td>\n1,569<\/td>\n1,524<\/td>\nJune 5, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (90)<\/strong>Nov 29, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (50)<\/strong><\/td>\nForestry, goods and services, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fauquier, Burton, Edgewood<\/td>\n170<\/td>\nNo data<\/td>\nJune 15, 2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (75)<\/strong><\/td>\nForestry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lower Columbia River<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Castlegar<\/td>\n7,816<\/td>\n7,259<\/td>\nJune 6, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(100)<\/strong>Conference\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(120)<\/strong><\/td>\nGoods and services, public sector, forestry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rossland<\/td>\n3,556<\/td>\n3,278<\/td>\n<\/td>\nMining, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Trail<\/td>\n7,681<\/td>\n7,237<\/td>\nNov 28, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (40)<\/strong><\/td>\nMining, public sector, goods and services<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Salmo<\/td>\n1,139<\/td>\n1,007<\/td>\n<\/td>\nForestry, construction, manufacturing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Slocan River and Lake<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
New Denver<\/td>\n504<\/td>\n512<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGoods and services, tourism, mining<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Silverton<\/td>\n195<\/td>\n185<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGoods and services, tourism<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Slocan<\/td>\n296<\/td>\n314<\/td>\n<\/td>\nConstruction, goods and services, forestry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kootenay River and Lake<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Nelson<\/td>\n10,230<\/td>\n9,258<\/td>\nNov 27, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (105)<\/strong>Mar 21, 2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (20)<\/strong><\/td>\nPublic sector, retail, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kaslo<\/td>\n1,026<\/td>\n1,072<\/td>\n<\/td>\nForestry, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Creston<\/td>\n5,306<\/td>\n4,826<\/td>\nMay 30, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (30)<\/strong>Nov 15, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (47)<\/strong><\/td>\nAgriculture, public sector, goods and services, forestry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Koocanusa Reservoir<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cranbrook<\/td>\n19,319<\/td>\n18,329<\/td>\n<\/td>\nPublic sector, forestry, goods and services<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jaffray<\/td>\n494<\/td>\nNo data<\/td>\nMay 29, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (55)<\/strong>Nov 14, 2012\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (24)<\/strong><\/td>\nPublic sector, tourism<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Elkford<\/td>\n2,523<\/td>\n2,463<\/td>\n<\/td>\nMining, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fernie<\/td>\n4,448<\/td>\n4,217<\/td>\n<\/td>\nMining, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sparwood<\/td>\n3,667<\/td>\n3,618<\/td>\n<\/td>\nMining, public sector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kimberley<\/td>\n6,652<\/td>\n6,139<\/td>\n<\/td>\nPublic sector, forestry, construction, mining<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Appendix 3: Ministry of Energy and Mines \u2013 Columbia Basin Trust Memorandum of Understanding<\/h3>\n

Columbia Basin Trust Memorandum of Understanding<\/a>\u00a0(PDF 487KB)<\/p>\n

Appendix 4: Columbia River Treaty Local Governments\u2019 Committee Terms of Reference<\/h3>\n

\u00a0Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee <\/strong><\/p>\n

Terms of Reference <\/strong><\/p>\n

August 2011 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Background <\/strong><\/p>\n

Whereas: <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

1. <\/em><\/strong>The Columbia River Treaty (CRT) ratified by Canada and the USA in 1964 provided benefits for Pacific Northwest region as a whole but has specific regional and local impacts to the area known as the Canadian Columbia Basin (the Region).<\/p>\n

2. <\/em><\/strong>Consideration is currently being given by US and Canadian Entities based on an opportunity to renew, amend or terminate the CRT and some of its sub-agreements.<\/p>\n

3. <\/em><\/strong>Local governments within the Region (Local Governments) have expressed a desire to actively and meaningfully engage in decisions around the future of the CRT on behalf of the residents of the Region (Basin Residents).<\/p>\n

Therefore<\/em><\/strong>:<\/p>\n

Local Governments have agreed to work together in creating the Columbia River Treaty Committee (<\/strong>CRT Committee) to assist Local Governments and Region residents to engage in decisions around the future of the CRT and work collaboratively with Columbia Basin Trust (CBT) on this issue.<\/p>\n

1. Role: <\/strong><\/p>\n

The CRT Committee will provide a coordinated venue to:<\/p>\n