{"id":2005,"date":"2017-01-30T21:15:57","date_gmt":"2017-01-30T21:15:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/?page_id=2005"},"modified":"2017-02-09T22:11:39","modified_gmt":"2017-02-09T22:11:39","slug":"frequently-asked-questions","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/frequently-asked-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Frequently Asked Questions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The following is a list of frequently asked questions regarding the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p>\n<div class=\"panel-group bcgov-faq-manager\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09\" role=\"region\" aria-multiselectable=\"true\"><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2776\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2776\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2776\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Who did the Province involve in the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2776\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty Review included\u00a0consultation with First Nations,\u00a0and engagement of stakeholder groups and the public, including youth. The Ministry of Energy and Mines Columbia River Treaty Review Team worked closely with the\u00a0Columbia River Treaty Local Governments\u2019 Committee, to understand and consider their constituents\u2019 views.<\/p><p>The Columbia River Treaty Review Team also worked with the Federal government and other provincial agencies to ensure a streamlined, effective approach to the Review.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2791\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2791\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2791\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Canadian federal government\u2019s role in the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2791\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2012\/04\/Can-BC-Agreement-July-8-1963.pdf\">Canada-British Columbia Agreement (1963)<\/a> transferred most treaty rights and obligations to the Province.<\/p><p>Although this agreement retains Canada\u2019s constitutional jurisdiction for international treaties, it requires Canada to obtain the concurrence of the Province before terminating or amending the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>Canada and British Columbia are cooperating in the review and any future decisions.<\/p><p>The federal government supports British Columbia\u2019s lead procedural role in the Columbia River Treaty Review, however each government will have their own decision making process.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2796\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2796\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2796\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the United States doing to review the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2796\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are responsible for implementing the Columbia River Treaty on behalf of the United States.<\/p><p>They conducted a multi-year review process, the 2014\/2024 Columbia River Treaty Review, to consider options in advance of 2014 in order to be able to make a recommendation to the United States Department of State on whether or not to give notice to terminate the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>This process resulted in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bpa.gov\/-\/media\/Aep\/projects\/columbia-river-treaty\/crt-regional-recommendation-12-13-13.pdf\">U.S. Entity Regional Recommendation for the Future of the Columbia River Treaty after 2024<\/a>, which was forwarded to the U.S. Department of State in December 2013.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2801\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2801\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2801\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What were the objectives of the Columbia River Treaty Review public engagement?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2801\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Columbia River Treaty Review public engagement was intended to be a meaningful and constructive process informed by the following principles:<\/p><ol><li>Inclusive, Transparent and Honest<ol><li>Consult on the design of the public engagement process in consideration of participants\u2019 needs, local methods of participation and representation, and logistical constraints.<\/li><li>Encourage open sharing of all relevant perspectives and respect all related viewpoints, information, experiences, interests, values and contributions.<\/li><li>Include as many individuals as wish to participate in the process, and provide various ways to participate and be heard, including face-to-face meetings, by mail and online.<\/li><li>Be clear with participants about their roles, constraints and opportunities to provide input into the decision process.<\/li><\/ol><\/li><li>Create Capacity to Participate<ol><li>Provide participants with as much information as possible to ensure they have the knowledge and confidence to participate in the consultation process<\/li><\/ol><\/li><li>Constructive Engagement<ol><li>Build on previous or existing processes.<\/li><li>Listen, learn, provide clarity and address misunderstandings.<\/li><li>Encourage high quality dialogue that recognizes all related interests, deepens understanding and builds relationships.<\/li><li>Use diverse methods to ensure participants are engaged, share information, and provide feedback.<\/li><li>Ensure an authentic process where public input will be considered by decision makers.<\/li><\/ol><\/li><li>Close the Loop<ol><li>Inform participants how their input was considered.<\/li><\/ol><\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2806\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2806\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2806\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How does the Columbia River Treaty Review build on past engagements with Columbia River Basin residents on water interests?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2806\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty Review Team reviewed residents\u2019 values and interests articulated in past community engagements on water management issues in the Columbia River Basin.<\/p><p>These include the Water Use Planning process (2000-2007) and the Non-Treaty Storage Agreement consultations (2011) carried out by BC Hydro, and the recent Columbia Basin Trust community information sessions on the Columbia River Treaty (2011-12).<\/p><p>We acknowledge the considerable time and effort invested in previous engagement processes and built on the information already gathered in carrying out the Columbia River Treaty Review public consultation process.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2811\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2811\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2811\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How did the Province engage with residents of the Columbia River Basin?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2811\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>We engaged through this website, community meetings and a youth event. See the <a href=\"http:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2017\/01\/Columbia-River-Treaty-Review-Public-Consultation-Report-_March-2014.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Columbia River Treaty Review Public Consultation Report<\/a> for full details on the Public Engagement process.<\/p><p>Click here for <a href=\"http:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/ways-to-participate\/\">ways to stay engaged<\/a> on the Columbia River Treaty Review and potential future Treaty negotiations.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2816\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2816\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2816\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2816\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee was formed in 2011. The regional districts of Central Kootenay, Columbia Shuswap, East Kootenay and Kootenay Boundary each appointed two members to the committee. The Village of Valemount and the Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Governments each appointed one member.<\/p><p>The Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee worked\u00a0with the Columbia Basin Trust to create education and awareness activities in the region. They helped the Province understand regional views, values and interests with respect to the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>In December 2013, the Local Governments Committee submitted their recommendations on the Columbia River Treaty to the provincial and federal governments for incorporation into the current decisions regarding the future of the CRT. For more information, visit their website: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">https:\/\/crtlgc.ca<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10077\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10077\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10077\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Cleanup and remediation of shoreline debris<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10077\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><figure id=\"attachment_10222\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10222\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-10222\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-300x187.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"187\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-300x187.jpg 300w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-1024x638.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-768x479.jpg 768w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-1536x957.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Arrow-Clean-Up_BC-Hydro-2048x1276.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10222\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: The barge crew accessing a priority site to remove materials from the shoreline. The barge crew consists of a barge, a crew boat, an excavator and three crew members. Submitted by BC Hydro.<\/figcaption><\/figure><p><strong>103.\u00a0 Will the beach area and old town site of Burton be cleaned up of a lot of rusted metal, glass etc. that was left from the flooding? And is it a serious health and environmental concern?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Is there anything being done to clean up the Burton beach?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>The area we live at is littered with debris, it is\u00a0very dangerous, and it is a disgraceful mess to this beautiful valley.\u00a0 We, along with others request this be cleaned up.\u00a0 What couldn\u2019t be burned was buried, and it is long past time for removal of vehicles, farm equipment, oil barrels etc. to bring back the natural beauty and to remove these dangerous items.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Regarding dangerous debris,\u00a0what are the plans to clean up old townsite debris?\u00a0 i.e.: rusted metal, foundation debris and garbage?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>If there are no such plans to remove the debris, then will BC Hydro assume liability for any and all injury to persons or persons property (watercraft) as a result of not removing the debris now surfacing as a result of lower water levels?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> In the fall\/winter of 2023, BC Hydro undertook an inventory of the structures and materials that exist along the shores of Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 This includes old building foundations, rusted metal, broken glass, and recent garbage.\u00a0 These structures and materials have now been assessed based on environmental considerations, archeological and heritage values, accessibility, and public safety concerns.<\/p><p>BC Hydro commenced work to start to remove some of these structures and materials in February of 2024.\u00a0 Work will take place over a four-week period, and efforts will be concentrated in high use areas that are easily accessible.\u00a0 Please note that in some areas, work can only be done by hand and without any excavation due to environmental considerations.\u00a0 Following this initial clean-up, BC Hydro will evaluate the remaining structures and materials for potential removal.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10127\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10127\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10127\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Salmon reintroduction<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10127\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>116.\u00a0 What is the plan to get salmon back? It&#8217;s not like you can just build a ladder at Grand Coulee Dam.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Salmon restoration is being addressed in two different, yet parallel, processes \u2013 within the Columbia River Treaty context and outside of it.<\/p><p>There are some factors related to salmon survival in the Upper Columbia that are directly impacted by the Treaty and so must be part of Treaty modernization discussions.\u00a0 There has been encouraging progress at the negotiating table to determine what transboundary collaboration to support salmon reintroduction looks like.\u00a0 More details will be shared publicly once an agreement-in-principle has been reached.<\/p><p>Other factors, such as salmon habitat, are being addressed through the <a href=\"https:\/\/columbiariversalmon.ca\/\">Columbia River Salmon Reintroduction Initiative<\/a> \u2013 a collaborative effort between Indigenous Nations, B.C. and Canada to study the feasibility of returning salmon to the Upper Columbia River.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10067\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10067\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10067\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Impacts to fish<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10067\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><figure id=\"attachment_10207\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10207\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-10207\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Site-AL-4-BCHydro_Environmental_Contractors_08Sept2023-2048x1536.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10207\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Crews work to salvage fish from stranding pools along the shorelines of Arrow Lakes Reservoir, September 2023. Submitted by BC Hydro.<\/figcaption><\/figure><p><strong>96.\u00a0 We are used to water level drops in the Arrow Lakes area. What is alarming is the rate of water released in gallons per day that was done during spawning season.\u00a0 Can an explanation be given for the rapid release of water during spawning season?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, BC Hydro is required to continue to release water to the U.S. during periods of dry conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro did not send any more water than what is absolutely required, and this was managed and reviewed daily as part of inflow forecasts and operations planning.\u00a0 BC Hydro and the U.S. coordinated additional storage in the spring of 2023 to support higher Arrow levels from May through June. \u00a0However, any water stored in the spring was later released from July through mid-August to meet U.S.\u00a0 domestic needs as required under the agreement.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>97.\u00a0 Is BC Hydro going to fund a fish ladder at Grand Coulee with their 8 billion profit last year?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Fish passage in the U.S. portion of the Columbia basin is the responsibility of the U.S. government.<\/p><p><strong>98.\u00a0 Will there be any initiatives to improve spawning channels on more creeks along the Arrow Lakes?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship:<\/strong> The Hill Creek Spawning Channel provides enhanced spawning habitat for Arrow Lakes Reservoir and compensates for significant spawning habitat lost upstream of Revelstoke dam.\u00a0 Collectively, spawning habitat is not limiting for Arrow reservoir kokanee.\u00a0 Creating more spawning channel habitat elsewhere is not expected to improve overall kokanee outcomes. \u00a0However, there are issues with spawner access and habitat for some of the smaller spawning tributaries which are of concern to the Province and BC Hydro.\u00a0 Those issues will not be resolved by constructing spawning channels but rather through site specific habitat improvement measures where feasible.\u00a0 Unfortunately, in years with low tributary flows into the reservoir due to climatic conditions (e.g. drought), particularly in combination with low reservoir levels, access to spawning habitat in some tributaries cannot be resolved through habitat improvement.<\/p><p><strong>99.\u00a0 What is being done to address the low water levels and the impact to our fish and overall habitat loss in the Valley? The loss is extreme and should never be allowed to happen again. What is the plan moving forward?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong>The Fish &amp; Wildlife Compensation Program (FWCP) is a partnership between BC Hydro, the Province of B.C., Fisheries and Oceans Canada, First Nations and public stakeholders to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife in watersheds impacted by existing BC Hydro dams.<\/p><p>The FWCP is funded annually by BC Hydro.\u00a0 The FWCP directs those funds towards priority actions across its three regions to fulfil its mission and work towards its vision of thriving fish and wildlife populations in watersheds that are functioning and sustainable.\u00a0 The Fish &amp; Wildlife Compensation Program conserves and enhances fish and wildlife in watersheds impacted by BC Hydro dams.<\/p><p>Although fish stranding is not an uncommon occurrence and can happen in any year, BC Hydro recognizes that the impacts were more significant under last year\u2019s operating conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro documented all reports of fish stranding on Arrow Lakes Reservoir during last year\u2019s drought conditions.\u00a0 In addition, to minimize impacts to fish, crews were deployed to assess stranding sites and salvage fish where possible.\u00a0 530 kilometres of shoreline were assessed to identify pools and focus ground surveys and salvage efforts, and 159 pools were sampled at 26 different sites.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship<\/strong>: The Province, the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, and BC Hydro also surveyed creek mouths in advance of spawning migration to assess passage as well as collecting additional water temperature data.\u00a0 Ground and aerial counts for kokanee are complete and information indicates the kokanee spawner return increased compared to recent years and that fish were able to access the tributaries where the majority of fish in Arrow Lakes Reservoir return to spawn.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are seeking improvements in the Treaty through negotiations with the U.S. to reduce the type of impacts we\u2019ve seen on Arrow Lakes this past year.\u00a0 The additional flexibility the Canadian negotiation delegation is seeking would allow B.C. to adjust its Treaty dam operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests.\u00a0 There is river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of this involves looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p><strong>100.\u00a0 Were there any environmental and\/or biological studies completed in August and September 2023 relating to the impact low water levels have had regarding fish spawning, stranded fish in pools, mortality, and before and after fish population data (for the time periods of August to September 2023)?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong>Although fish stranding is not an uncommon occurrence and can happen in any year, BC Hydro recognizes that the impacts were more significant under last year\u2019s operating conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro documented all reports of fish stranding on Arrow Lakes Reservoir during last year\u2019s drought conditions.\u00a0 In addition, to minimize impacts to fish, crews were deployed to assess stranding sites and salvage fish where possible.\u00a0 530 kilometres of shoreline were assessed to identify pools and focus ground surveys and salvage efforts, and 159 pools were sampled at 26 different sites.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship<\/strong>: The Province, the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, and BC Hydro also surveyed creek mouths in advance of spawning migration to assess passage as well as collecting additional water temperature data.\u00a0 Ground and aerial counts for kokanee are complete and information indicates the kokanee spawner return increased compared to recent years and that fish were able to access the tributaries where the majority of fish in Arrow Lakes Reservoir return to spawn.\u00a0 \u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>101.\u00a0 What are your plans to mitigate the impacts of rapid volume release of water during spawning periods?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, BC Hydro is required to continue sending water to the U.S. during periods of dry conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro did not send any more water than what is absolutely required, and this was managed and reviewed daily as part of inflow forecasts and operations planning.\u00a0 Unfortunately, BC Hydro does not have the unilateral rights to hold back flows for Canadian fisheries objectives without agreement from its U.S. counterparts.<\/p><p>The operation of Arrow Lakes Reservoir follows the Lower Columbia Fish Stranding protocol to help minimize impacts on fish by coordinating fish salvage response if needed during a flow reduction or implementing ramp rates as required to manage flow changes.<\/p><p>Although fish stranding is not an uncommon occurrence and can happen in any year, BC Hydro recognizes that the impacts were more significant under last year\u2019s operating conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro documented all reports of fish stranding on Arrow Lakes Reservoir during last year\u2019s drought conditions.\u00a0 In addition, to minimize impacts to fish, crews were deployed to assess stranding sites and salvage fish where possible.\u00a0 530 kilometres of shoreline were assessed to identify pools and focus ground surveys and salvage efforts, and 159 pools were sampled at 26 different sites.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship:<\/strong> The Province, the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, and BC Hydro also surveyed creek mouths in advance of spawning migration to assess passage as well as collecting additional water temperature data.\u00a0 Ground and aerial counts for kokanee are complete and information indicates the kokanee spawner return increased compared to recent years and that fish were able to access the tributaries where the majority of fish in Arrow Lakes reservoir return to spawn.\u00a0 The Province through the FWCP enumerates kokanee spawners annually as a component of the Arrow Lakes Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Program and the Hill Creek Spawning Channel.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> As part of negotiations to modernize the Treaty, Canadian and U.S. delegations are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries, including fish spawning and other ecosystems objectives.<\/p><p><strong>102.\u00a0 What future plans are being considered to avoid rapid water level drops (volume per day released through the dam)?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, BC Hydro is required to continue sending water to the U.S. during periods of dry conditions.\u00a0 Last summer and fall, BC Hydro did not send any more water than what is absolutely required, and this was managed and reviewed daily as part of inflow forecasts and operations planning.\u00a0 Unfortunately, BC Hydro does not have the unilateral rights to hold back flows for Canadian objectives without agreement from its U.S. counterparts.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> As part of negotiations to modernize the Treaty, Canadian and U.S. delegations are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries.\u00a0 Further details are confidential as negotiations are still underway; however, before any agreement is finalized, we will explain to Basin residents what is being proposed and seek feedback.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10057\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10057\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10057\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Impacts to boat access<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10057\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><figure id=\"attachment_10197\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10197\" style=\"width: 333px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-10197\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/JaymeJones_Syringa_BoatLaunch_2023Aug23_lowres-1024x768.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"333\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/JaymeJones_Syringa_BoatLaunch_2023Aug23_lowres-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/JaymeJones_Syringa_BoatLaunch_2023Aug23_lowres-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/JaymeJones_Syringa_BoatLaunch_2023Aug23_lowres-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/JaymeJones_Syringa_BoatLaunch_2023Aug23_lowres.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 333px) 100vw, 333px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10197\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Stranded boat at Scotties Marina, August 2023<\/figcaption><\/figure><p><strong>93.\u00a0 What will the minimum water level be this winter? With the winter season coming it would be best to do what we can to our boats now and not during December or January in freezing temperatures and access compromised. <\/strong><strong>Half of Scotties Marina is either on land or very shallow water and not usable. Some of the boats are larger and are moored year-round.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Arrow Lakes Reservoir reached its latest minimum elevation of 422.7 metres (1,387 feet) on Thursday, January 11, 2024, for the winter of 2023\/24.\u00a0 This year\u2019s summer levels will be dependent on snowpack, rainfall, power generation requirements, Columbia River Treaty provisions, and other variables.\u00a0 If you would like to receive BC Hydro\u2019s regular forecasts by email, please email <a href=\"mailto:southern-interior.info@bchydro.com\">southern-interior.info@bchydro.com<\/a>.<\/p><p><strong>94.\u00a0 Regardless of the Treaty outcome, why is our boat launches (Syringa) for example not being upgraded so they can actually be used more than 2 months of the year with the docks in the water?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>It is completely ridiculous that all of our boat launches are unusable, this is absurd.\u00a0 What is being done to rectify this?\u00a0<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> As part of BC Hydro\u2019s water licence, they are required to provide access to Arrow Lakes Reservoir during the peak recreation season.\u00a0 To meet this requirement, BC Hydro completed construction and upgrades of boat ramps for use during the recreation period, which is generally considered to be from mid-June to mid-September.\u00a0 The Comptroller of Water Rights has confirmed that, subject to meeting maintenance requirements, BC Hydro has met their obligations to provide access to the reservoir.<\/p><p>BC Hydro tries to make dock lengths as long as practically possible to cover water fluctuations during the summer boating season.\u00a0 Unfortunately, extending the length of the dock at Syringa is not technically feasible.<\/p><p><strong>95.\u00a0 An acknowledgment of the many issues that have arisen since residents and friends of Arrow Lakes with specific follow up actions was not detailed or committed.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong><\/p><p><strong><em>Reservoir<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> clean up:<\/em><\/strong> In the fall\/winter of 2023, BC Hydro undertook an inventory of the structures and materials that exist along the shores of Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 This includes old building foundations, rusted metal, broken glass, and recent garbage.\u00a0 These structures and materials have now been assessed based on environmental considerations, archeological and heritage values, accessibility, and public safety concerns.<\/p><p>BC Hydro commenced work to start to remove some of these structures and materials in February of 2024.\u00a0 Work will take place over a four-week period, and efforts will be concentrated in high use areas that are easily accessible.\u00a0 Please note that in some areas, work can only be done by hand and without any excavation due to environmental considerations.\u00a0 Following this initial clean-up, BC Hydro will evaluate the remaining structures and materials for potential removal.<\/p><p><strong><em>Fish Stranding:<\/em><\/strong> To minimize impacts to fish, crews were deployed to assess stranding sites and salvage fish where possible.\u00a0 530 kilometres of shoreline were assessed to identify pools and focus ground surveys and salvage efforts, and 159 pools were sampled at 26 different sites.\u00a0 The salvaged fish are mostly small and young, the vast majority being Northern Pikeminnow, Redside Shiner, Carp, Suckers, Dace, and Sculpins.<\/p><p><strong><em>Archaeology:<\/em><\/strong> The low levels also exposed archeological sites across the reservoir.\u00a0 Additional archeological assessments were completed in low elevation areas, and known exposed archeological sites were revisited.\u00a0 The preliminary results show several new sites were recorded, and several existing sites were expanded.\u00a0 BC Hydro also mobilized the Guardian Watch Program to have a presence on the reservoir and spread information about the importance of archeological resources.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong><\/p><p><strong><em>Mitigating low reservoir levels:<\/em><\/strong> Canadian negotiating team is seeking more flexibility for how B.C. operates its Treaty dams. \u00a0The additional flexibility will allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, without agreement from the U.S. \u00a0There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility. \u00a0Part of that research includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10012\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10012\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10012\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Contrast between reservoir levels in B.C. compared to those in the United States<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10012\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>32.\u00a0 Why are we repeatedly told that the low water levels are the result of flood control and requirement of the Treaty to release 5500 m<sup>3<\/sup>\/s when you may have heard the there is a drought from Mexico to the Yukon? No need for any flood control this year, levels could have been kept at 1440 since last February! Also, 5500 m<sup>3<\/sup>\/s is a joke, as up to 58000 m<sup>3<\/sup>\/s has been released from the Arrow Lakes this summer and now due to the extreme low levels now 680 m<sup>3<\/sup>\/s are being realised! Meantime water is spilled and wasted in the U.S.A.!<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, BC Hydro is required to continue sending water to the U.S. during dry periods.\u00a0 BC Hydro did not send any more water than what is absolutely required, to meet legal Treaty obligations and this was managed and reviewed daily as part of forecasts and operations planning.\u00a0 There is no provision under the Treaty for Canada to hold back additional water during drought conditions.<\/p><p>Although the lowest possible release of water rate is 5,000 cubic feet per second (ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s), this does not mean this is all that BC Hydro is required to release.\u00a0 Discharges at 5,000 ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s would only be expected when the Treaty requires that more water is held in Canadian storage.\u00a0 A recent example is the week of February 10, 2024, when discharges from Arrow Lakes Reservoir were reduced to 5,000 ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s due to the atmospheric river event in the U.S., which resulted in significant inflows for the U.S. portion of the basin.<\/p><p><strong>33.\u00a0 If both countries were to share benefits equitably, why does the U.S. have full lakes and reservoirs and Arrow Lake is empty. How is this fair or equitable?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>The objective of the power coordination provision in the current Treaty is to optimize electricity generation in the U.S.\u00a0 The downstream power benefits are shared between the two countries by way of the Canadian Entitlement.<\/p><p>Water that would have flowed from Arrow Lakes Reservoir to Lake Roosevelt and through Grand Coulee Dam was likely kept in Lake Roosevelt this year to prepare for winter power generation needs.\u00a0 Additionally, flows from Lake Roosevelt are often released through Grand Coulee Dam later in the year to enhance downstream salmon populations.<\/p><p>The Canadian negotiation delegation is seeking improvements to a modernized Treaty that not only reflects a fair, equitable sharing of benefits, but also reduces impacts to the B.C. portion of the Basin.<\/p><p><strong>34.\u00a0 How can the Grand Coulee Dam light show be justified from May long weekend to September 30 every evening during a drought year or any year? It doesn&#8217;t appear this waste of water is part of the CRT.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>That light show flows water for approximately 39 minutes everyday day during those months.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>It is also tough to think we are in drought when they spill water over Coulee for a light show every night during summer.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>It would also be appreciated to know that we are holding the U.S. accountable for their water waste with the Grand Coulee Dam nightly water wasting show.\u00a0 Totally unnecessary in a drought year.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>The Treaty does not oblige the U.S. to use water in any particular way.\u00a0 In fact, under the Treaty, both countries are able to use water for their own domestic purposes.\u00a0 Once water flows across the border, the U.S. can manage it for any downstream purposes.<\/p><p><strong>35.\u00a0 The treaty was designed for flood control and power generation; therefore why is the water diverted from Grand Coulee Dam to IRRIGATE their dry barren land, to plant and sell crops? Irrigation was not part of the Treaty agreement.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Under the Treaty, both countries can use water for their own domestic purposes, including to support irrigation, navigation, and fisheries.\u00a0 Once the water crosses the border, the U.S. can manage it to meet any number of domestic objectives.<\/p><p>Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are seeking changes in the Treaty through negotiations with the U.S. that recognize the many ways the U.S. benefits from B.C.\u2019s Treaty flow regulation.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>36.\u00a0 Where is this drought that you keeping talking about? The Columbia River to the Tri-cities in Washington State has been full all summer and we have nothing.\u00a0 WHY?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro<\/strong>: In 2023, British Columbia experienced severe drought conditions.\u00a0 Drought levels in the Upper and Lower Columbia Basins ranged from drought levels 3 to 5 for the majority of the summer, which was similar to conditions across much of the province.\u00a0 For reference, please see Figure 2.<\/p><figure id=\"attachment_10187\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10187\" style=\"width: 1024px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-10187\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-2-2023-Drought-Levels-at-a-Glance-1024x428.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"428\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-2-2023-Drought-Levels-at-a-Glance-1024x428.png 1024w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-2-2023-Drought-Levels-at-a-Glance-300x125.png 300w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-2-2023-Drought-Levels-at-a-Glance-768x321.png 768w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-2-2023-Drought-Levels-at-a-Glance.png 1430w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10187\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2: 2023 Drought Levels at a Glance, prepared by Water Management Branch &#8211; Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship<\/figcaption><\/figure><p><strong>37.\u00a0 Provided the drought and all the catastrophes are real, why isn\u2019t the pain shared across the border?? Why is it up to B.C. to suffer a drought and Washington state is business as usual?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>The Columbia River Treaty includes legal requirements that must be met unless the Treaty is terminated, or a modernized Treaty is in place.\u00a0 This includes the requirement B.C. has to provide a certain volume of water to the U.S.\u00a0 throughout the year for flood-risk management purposes and downstream hydropower generation.\u00a0 In addition, Canada (B.C.) is required to release more water during dry conditions in the U.S. to enable the U.S. to meet their firm energy requirements.<\/p><p>The Canadian negotiation delegation is strongly advocating for improvements in the Treaty, though its negotiations with the U.S., to help mitigate the type of impacts we\u2019ve seen on Arrow Lakes Reservoir this year.\u00a0 Two key goals for the Canadian team are to gain more flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated, and to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, which will help both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p><strong>38.\u00a0 Enough misuse of water by the US. As their desert land flourishes our land becomes desert land with frequent and unbearable dust storms.\u00a0 What will the new treaty bring for our area?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The current Treaty requires B.C. to provide a certain volume of water to the United States throughout the year for flood-risk management purposes and downstream hydropower generation.\u00a0 Beyond that, both countries can use water for their own domestic purposes.<\/p><p>As Canada and the U.S. seek to modernize the Treaty, they are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wider range of interests in both countries.<\/p><p>The Canadian negotiation delegation, which includes Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations, is strongly advocating for improvements to the Treaty that could reduce the types of impacts we\u2019ve seen on Arrow Lakes Reservoir this year.<\/p><p>One of the priorities for the Canadian negotiating team is to gain increased flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated.\u00a0 The additional flexibility could allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests in the B.C. Basin, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of this process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc, and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also aiming to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p><strong>39.\u00a0 It seems to me that the U.S. is diverting water for irrigation from its reservoirs and expecting us to maintain their levels with added water (Arrow Lakes) for Hydro. Is anything being done to correct this?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Under the Treaty, B.C. is required to send a certain volume of water to the U.S. throughout the year for flood risk management and power generation purposes only.\u00a0 Beyond that, both countries can use water for their own domestic purposes, which includes irrigation, so once the water crosses the border, the U.S. can determine how it\u2019s used.\u00a0 Canada\/B.C. is not required to maintain specific reservoir elevations south of the border, regardless of how the U.S. manages the water.\u00a0 Once B.C. releases the volume of water required under the Treaty, its obligations have been met.<\/p><p>As part of negotiations to modernize the Treaty, the Canadian and U.S. delegations are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wider range of interests in both countries.<\/p><p>One of the priorities for the Canadian negotiating team is to gain increased flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated.\u00a0 The additional flexibility could allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests in the B.C. Basin, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that research includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc, and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also aiming to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p>The Canadian Entitlement is half of the additional potential hydroelectric power that could be produced in the U.S. as a result of how B.C. operates its Treaty dams.\u00a0 It is calculated in advance using formulas included in the Treaty.\u00a0 The U.S. returns this power to Canada in the form of electricity at the Canada-U.S. border in B.C.\u00a0 Powerex, the marketing and trading subsidiary of BC Hydro, sells the Canadian Entitlement at market value to either BC Hydro or utilities in Alberta or United States.\u00a0 Revenues from the Canadian Entitlement are paid to the Province and go into its general revenue fund.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9957\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9957\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-9957\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">BC Hydro\u2019s management of reservoir levels and outflows<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9957\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>1.\u00a0 If the CRT requires 14.1-million-acre ft. of storage and BC Hydro has released over this amount since May 1, why is BC Hydro continuing to outflow more than the 5000 cubic ft per second as documented within the current treaty? Thank you.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, BC Hydro is required to continue sending water to the U.S. during periods of dry conditions.\u00a0 BC Hydro did not send any more water than what is absolutely required to meet Treaty obligations, and this was managed and reviewed daily as part of water flow forecasts and operations planning.\u00a0 \u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p>Although the lowest possible release of water rate is 5,000 cubic feet per second (ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s), this does not mean this is all that BC Hydro is required to release.\u00a0 Discharges at 5,000 ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s would only be expected when the Treaty requires that more water is held in Canadian storage.\u00a0 A recent example is the week of February 10, 2024, when discharges from Arrow Lakes Reservoir were reduced to 5,000 ft<sup>3<\/sup>\/s due to the atmospheric river event in the U.S., which resulted in significant inflows for the U.S. portion of the basin.<\/p><p>The 15 million-acre-feet of storage does not equate to discharges from the dams as the inflows to the reservoirs far exceeds the storage.\u00a0 The storage just provides some shaping of the flow releases.\u00a0 The annual average inflows into Kinbasket, Revelstoke, and Arrow are approximately 30 million-acre-feet.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>2.\u00a0 Why is Hydro allowed to negotiate side deals?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The Treaty Entities\u2014BC Hydro, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)\u2014periodically negotiate and sign supplemental operating agreements when there is mutual benefit to modify the water releases specified by the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 These supplemental operating agreements remain compliant within the Treaty.\u00a0 The ability to enter into these agreements is enabled by Columbia River Treaty.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><figure id=\"attachment_10167\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10167\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10167 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/DrawndownBeach_CastlegarNews_2023Sep20-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/DrawndownBeach_CastlegarNews_2023Sep20-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/DrawndownBeach_CastlegarNews_2023Sep20-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/DrawndownBeach_CastlegarNews_2023Sep20-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/DrawndownBeach_CastlegarNews_2023Sep20.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10167\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: McDonald Creek Provincial Park, September 2023, as seen in the Castlegar News<\/figcaption><\/figure><p><strong>3.\u00a0 Why was the drawdown so big this summer?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer <\/strong><strong>from<\/strong><strong> BC Hydro:<\/strong> The low levels observed in 2023 were due to a combination of below average snowpack during the winter of 2022\/23, the early depletion or melt of the below average snow levels in May, and the following severe drought conditions observed in the Columbia basin.\u00a0 The combination of low inflows into the reservoir and required Columbia River Treaty discharges resulted in an exceptional deeper draft (lowering) of Arrow Lakes Reservoir over the summer and fall.\u00a0 Additionally, water releases from Kinbasket Reservoir that might otherwise keep Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels higher were managed, similar to prior low inflow years, to ensure sufficient water storage for winter energy supply for Revelstoke and Mica Generation Stations.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p>While last year\u2019s Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels and drawdown caused a number of significant challenges, it\u2019s important to note that the reservoir did operate as expected under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty and severe drought conditions.\u00a0 Should similar conditions occur in the future under the current Treaty, similar operations would be expected.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>4.\u00a0 Am I correct in believing that any question involving BC Hydro, such as beach cleanup, boat launches, a bridge etc. are not going to be answered?<\/strong><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong><\/p><p><strong><em>Reservoir<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> clean up:<\/em><\/strong> In the fall\/winter of 2023, BC Hydro undertook an inventory of the structures and materials that exist along the shores of Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 This includes old building foundations, rusted metal, broken glass, and recent garbage.\u00a0 These structures and materials have now been assessed based on environmental considerations, archeological and heritage values, accessibility, and public safety concerns.<\/p><p>BC Hydro commenced work to start to remove some of these structures and materials in February of 2024.\u00a0 Work will take place over a four-week period, and efforts will be concentrated in high use areas that are easily accessible.\u00a0 Please note that in some areas, work can only be done by hand and without any excavation due to environmental considerations.\u00a0 Following this initial clean-up, BC Hydro will evaluate the remaining structures and materials for potential removal.<\/p><p><strong><em>Boat launches:<\/em><\/strong> As part of BC Hydro\u2019s water licence, they are required to provide access to Arrow Lakes Reservoir during the peak recreation season.\u00a0 To meet this requirement, BC Hydro completed construction and upgrades of boat ramps for use during the recreation period, which is generally considered to be from mid-June to mid-September.\u00a0 The Comptroller of Water Rights has confirmed that, subject to meeting maintenance requirements, BC Hydro has met their obligation to provide access to the reservoir.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong><\/p><p><strong><em>Fauquier-Needles Bridge:<\/em><\/strong> The decision about building a bridge between Fauquier and Needles is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.\u00a0 The Ministry assessed the feasibility of building a bridge and decided not to pursue that option.\u00a0 This issue has been raised before, during the Province\u2019s public engagement on the Columbia River Treaty, and residents have been divided on this issue.\u00a0 Some want a bridge and others do not, in order to prevent increased traffic through and to communities along Arrow Lakes.\u00a0 It\u2019s important to note that the idea of a Fauquier-Needles bridge is not part of the Columbia River Treaty, or a condition of it.\u00a0 Those interested in pursuing this further can contact the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.<\/p><p><strong><em>Other questions:<\/em><\/strong> Any additional questions for BC Hydro can be directed to <a href=\"mailto:southern-interior.info@bchydro.com\">southern-interior.info@bchydro.com<\/a>.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>5.\u00a0 Please focus a bit on this years&#8217; [2023] extreme drawdown reasons, thank-you.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer <\/strong><strong>from<\/strong><strong> BC Hydro:<\/strong> The low levels observed in 2023 were due to a combination of below average snow during the winter of 2022\/23, the early depletion of the below average snowpack in May, and the following severe drought conditions observed in the Columbia basin.\u00a0 The combination of low inflows and required Columbia River Treaty discharges resulted in an exceptional deeper draft (lowering) of Arrow Lakes Reservoir over the summer and fall.\u00a0 Additionally, discharges from Kinbasket Reservoir that might otherwise keep Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels higher, were managed, similar to prior low inflow years, to ensure sufficient water storage for winter energy supply for Revelstoke and Mica Generation Stations.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>6.\u00a0 I have a hard time believing that the levels have been this low ever at this time of year. In January, February and March yes, but not now&#8230;.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer <\/strong><strong>from<\/strong><strong> BC Hydro:<\/strong> That is correct.\u00a0 Last year\u2019s seasonal levels and rate of decline in August, September, and October have not been observed since the mid 1970s.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>7.\u00a0 During the summer the Columbia River was higher than usual. Looking at water levels now the Grand Coulee is at 85% full, Arrow is Low, Duncan is down 1\/3, and Kinbasket is near full.\u00a0 It appears that Arrow was drained to save water at Duncan and Kinbasket.\u00a0 Could there not have been a better sharing of water levels?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> All of the Columbia River Treaty basins operated below average in 2023.\u00a0 This includes Kinbasket, Arrow, and Duncan.\u00a0 Starting in August of 2023, BC Hydro increased flows from Duncan Reservoir in order to reduce flows from Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Water was also held in Kinbasket to meet the demand for power across the province during the winter months.<\/p><p><strong>8.\u00a0 Why are Lake Roosevelt levels so high when Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels are so low?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro is obligated to release flows under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 There is no provision for Canada to reduce flows under drought conditions, and they do not have the authority to hold back flows without agreement from their U.S. counterparts.<\/p><p>Once water flows across the border, the U.S. can manage it as they see fit.\u00a0 This includes energy purposes, fisheries, navigation, and many other downstream uses.\u00a0 The water that was held in Lake Roosevelt was used to meet U.S. domestic needs.<\/p><p>BC Hydro and the U.S. have, on occasion, found common ground to help meet objectives on both sides.\u00a0 For example, in May of 2023, flows from Arrow Lakes Reservoir were reduced because of mutual benefits with the U.S. to reduce peak flows in the U.S. and to support higher Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels in the spring.\u00a0 This agreement resulted in Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels being up to 8 feet higher than they would have otherwise been between May and August.\u00a0 The water was released by mid-August as per the agreement with the U.S. to meet U.S. fisheries objectives.<\/p><p><strong>9.\u00a0 What is the minimum lake level for full power production at the Arrow Dam?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Arrow Lakes Generating Station requires a minimum operating level between approximately 425.8 metres (1,397 feet) to 427.3 metres (1,402 feet).\u00a0 Arrow Lakes Generating Station contributes less than 1% of the total BC Hydro generation in an average year, and this generation is not a factor in the current reservoir levels.<\/p><p><strong>10.\u00a0 What is the minimum level for the Arrow Lake (i.e. discharge rates would be reduced)?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The normal licensed range for Arrow Lakes Reservoir is between 440.1 metres (1,444 feet) and 419.9 metres (1,377.9 feet).\u00a0 The reservoir can be operated up to two feet above its normal maximum level (to 440.7 metres or 1,446 feet) if approved by the Comptroller of Water Rights.\u00a0 Arrow Lakes Reservoir provides 7.1 million-acre-feet (MAF) of Treaty storage.<\/p><p><strong>11.\u00a0 Is it correct to say you kept the water storage in Kinbasket for winter but released more water from Arrow Lakes to respect treaty requirements?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Yes, water was being held in Kinbasket to ensure sufficient water storage to meet the demand for power across the province during the winter months.\u00a0 Additionally, because inflows were also below average into Kinbasket, there was also less water to release from Kinbasket.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>12.\u00a0 Am I missing something? I thought we were concerned about water levels and what the committee is doing to correct the existing problem. The Arrow is located in Canada not Portland, Oregon. \u00a0All the lakes and dams around us are full, so why can&#8217;t you adjust levels between them?\u00a0 Give us a straight answer.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> All of the Columbia River Treaty reservoirs operated below average in 2023.\u00a0 This includes Kinbasket, Arrow, and Duncan.\u00a0 Starting in August of 2023, BC Hydro increased flows from Duncan Reservoir in order to reduce flows from Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Water was held in Kinbasket Reservoir to meet the demand for power across the province during the winter months.<\/p><p><strong>13.\u00a0 Why is Mercer Celgar penalized, fined, when they over-generate electricity by BC Hydro??? We could be getting MORE!<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> As part of Government Phase 1 Comprehensive Review of BC Hydro, released in 2019, Government and BC Hydro worked together to develop a renewable organic material (biomass) energy strategy.\u00a0 This strategy included a Biomass Energy Program to address the expiry of the electricity purchase agreements for certain biomass facilities whose agreements were set to expire prior to 2022.\u00a0 Under the program, BC Hydro acquires energy from these eligible facilities through a combination of reduced power use (which is only available to BC Hydro customer generating facilities and which provides an incentive to these customers to offset part or all of their load) and energy purchases.\u00a0 The program includes a standard form of contract and set pricing.<\/p><p>Mercer Celgar\u2019s biomass facility was one of the projects whose agreement was due to expire, and they executed a Biomass Energy Program electricity purchase agreement in 2020.\u00a0 As they are not a BC Hydro customer, and are connected to the FortisBC grid, their electricity purchase agreement only provides for energy purchases by BC Hydro.<\/p><p>Under the Mercer Celgar electricity purchase agreement, BC Hydro pays for electricity delivered to BC Hydro in accordance with the terms of that agreement.\u00a0 Consistent with the parameters of the Biomass Energy Program, there are penalties if Mercer Celgar fails to deliver electricity under certain circumstances, but there are no penalties for over-generating.<\/p><p><strong>14.\u00a0 What was the natural average fluctuation of Arrow before the dam?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Based on data from the Water Survey of Canada gauges that were operating prior to the construction of the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam in 1968, the natural fluctuation of the Arrow Lakes ranged from approximately 1,377 feet (420 metres) up to early summer peaks between 1,393 feet (424.5 metres) and 1,409 feet (429.5 metres), for a fluctuation of up to 32 feet. This is illustrated in Figure 1.<\/p><figure id=\"attachment_10172\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10172\" style=\"width: 555px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10172 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-1-pre-and-post-regulation-hydrogrpaph-of-Arrow-Lake.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"555\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-1-pre-and-post-regulation-hydrogrpaph-of-Arrow-Lake.png 555w, https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/Figure-1-pre-and-post-regulation-hydrogrpaph-of-Arrow-Lake-300x243.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 555px) 100vw, 555px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10172\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1: Pre and post-regulation hydrograph of the Arrow Lakes.\u00a0 Reference: <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2020\/01\/Mid-Arrow-Report-FINAL_March_2018_Rev-3.1.pdf\">Arrow Lakes Reservoir Mid-Elevation Scenarios: Scoping Evaluation, March 2018<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>15.\u00a0 Is the Arrow suffering due to the Peace taking its time to fill the Site C Reservoir?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> No, Site C Reservoir construction and fill is not related to the Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels observed in 2023.\u00a0 Last year\u2019s low levels were due to a combination of below average snow during the winter of 2022\/23, the early depletion of the below average level of snow in May, and the following severe drought conditions observed in the Columbia basin during the summer and fall.\u00a0 The combination of low inflows and amount of water we must release to the U.S. under the Columbia River Treaty resulted in a larger amount of water being released from Arrow Reservoir over the summer and fall of 2023.\u00a0 Additionally, water in Kinbasket Reservoir that might otherwise keep Arrow higher, was managed similar to prior low water years, to ensure sufficient water storage for winter energy supply for Revelstoke and Mica Generation Stations.<\/p><p><strong>16.\u00a0 Why are watersheds not a part of Hydro\u2019s infrastructure?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro\u2019s water licences only extend to the storage of water in its reservoirs, not to the watersheds as a whole.<\/p><p><strong>17.\u00a0 Is BC Hydro a Crown entity? Does the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development have any say in its management?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro is a provincial Crown corporation, owned by the government of British Columbia.\u00a0 BC Hydro reports directly to the Minister of Energy, Mines, and Low Carbon Innovation.<\/p><p><strong>18.\u00a0 With the extreme water discharge this year since June 23rd, no real answer has been given as to why it was released so quickly and without any warning to residents, other than the weekly report. This has caused extreme hardship to properties.\u00a0 Transparency is required to prepare for this loss of water (at lakefront homes and properties) What is being done to ensure that we have available water for our homes in the future? We have a 1.5 km distance to the lakeshore.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro provides information on their operations in the Columbia basin in a number of ways, including:<\/p><ul><li>weekly operations updates that are sent via email,<\/li><li>a toll-free information line that provides up-to-date reservoir level and river flow information,<\/li><li>biannual operations summaries that are published every spring and fall,<\/li><li>near real-time reservoir level information on bchydro.com,<\/li><li>annual operations update meetings that are held every spring, and<\/li><li>responding to requests for information via phone, email, and in-person.<\/li><\/ul><p>In addition to the regular information BC Hydro provides about their Columbia basin operations, they also enhance their regular communications during periods of unusual operations, such as during the drought conditions observed in 2023.\u00a0 Last summer BC Hydro issued two supplementary advisories explaining the low Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels and advising on the forecast.\u00a0 The second advisory was accompanied by a background document that provided an overview on Arrow Lakes Reservoir operations, the Columbia River Treaty, and the Columbia basin.\u00a0 They also hosted virtual public meetings for local elected officials as well as a public virtual meeting.\u00a0 They have also responded to a high volume of questions and concerns via phone calls, emails, and in-person conversations.<\/p><p><strong>19.\u00a0 There wasn\u2019t really any clear explanation as to how there were lower levels above Mica and that the outflows from Mica were the major contributing factor to the Arrow\u2019s rapid and low drawdown. A comparison of the differences this year as compared to previous low water years would have made it lot easier to explain the reason why we are where we are this year.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> At the end of October 2023, Kinbasket Reservoir was approximately 7.5 metres (25 feet) higher than it was at the same time in 2001, a comparable dry year for the Canadian basin.\u00a0 In 2001, the water was released from Kinbasket to support Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels.\u00a0 In 2023, however, the water was held in storage to ensure that we could meet winter generation requirements due to province-wide drought conditions.<\/p><p>Mica Dam, which creates Kinbasket Reservoir, and Revelstoke Dam, which creates Revelstoke Reservoir, provide over 27% of BC Hydro\u2019s integrated energy.\u00a0 These dams are managed to provide sufficient energy generation across the winter.\u00a0 While Arrow Lakes Reservoir does not have a BC Hydro generation station, the Arrow Lakes Generating Station, owned by Columbia Power, provides less than 1% of BC Hydro\u2019s total generation.<\/p><p><strong>20.\u00a0 However, when most other lakes in the region are still full or near full and the Arrow Lakes are empty, the main reason for the low water level is not drought.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Most natural lakes and BC Hydro reservoirs were also below average during the summer of 2023.\u00a0 This was not unexpected given the province-wide drought conditions.\u00a0 The below normal seasonal levels were expected following a lower level of snowpack in the spring, and subsequent below average precipitation observed in many basins.\u00a0 All of the Columbia River Treaty reservoirs operated below average in 2023.\u00a0 This includes Kinbasket, Arrow, and Duncan.<\/p><p><strong>21.\u00a0 BC Hydro&#8217;s presentation confirmed the level was about maximizing profits. Does BC Hydro not have agreements to buy power from other sources?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels observed in 2023 were a result of the regional and provincial drought, compliance with the Columbia River Treaty, and upstream operations at Kinbasket for winter energy reliability. \u00a0Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels were not an outcome of maximizing profits.\u00a0 BC Hydro operates its integrated system under required licence and Treaty obligations, including Water Use Plan objectives, in consideration of providing reliable energy and minimizing costs to our ratepayers.<\/p><p>For further clarification, the Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels in 2023 were in no way driven by profit.\u00a0 \u00a0Arrow Lakes Reservoir was managed to keep levels as high as possible and to ensure that Kinbasket Reservoir, upstream, has sufficient water storage for the winter to ensure BC Hydro could meet load requirements across the winter.\u00a0 BC Hydro has not been exporting power at the expense of Arrow Lakes Reservoir elevations.\u00a0 There have been net imports into the BC Hydro system starting in January 2023 due to the ongoing drought.<\/p><p>BC Hydro does have about 130 Electricity Purchase Agreements with independent power producers and the energy from these agreements is included in BC Hydro\u2019s plans for the winter.<\/p><p><strong>22.\u00a0 If BC Hydro is so concerned about having enough power, why are BC Hydro and the BC government pushing so hard for everyone to switch to electric heat and electric vehicles?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong>The growing transition to clean energy is a key pathway to achieving BC Hydro\u2019s CleanBC emission reduction targets \u2013 and there is significant interest from the residential, commercial, transportation and industrial sectors in making the switch from using fossil fuels to clean electricity.\u00a0 As a result, electricity demand is forecast to increase by 15% or more by 2030.<\/p><p>To meet the growing demand, BC Hydro is adding Site C next year, which will add 8% to the current supply and provide enough clean electricity to power half a million homes or 1.7 million electric vehicles per year.<\/p><p>Government and BC Hydro have also partnered to launch a competitive call for power this spring to acquire 3,000 gigawatt hours per year of clean and renewable electricity, like wind and solar \u2013 the equivalent of powering 270,000 homes or adding 5% per cent our current supply.\u00a0 New projects will begin generation as early as 2028, and the call for power is expected to be the first in a series of calls in the coming years.<\/p><p>Additional actions BC Hydro is taking to meet the growing demand include accelerating or extending the timing of several of the existing near-term actions, including actions on energy efficiency, demand response, industrial load curtailment, electricity purchase agreement renewals, and utility-scale batteries.<\/p><p>BC Hydro is also now embarking on the next significant step forward \u2013 the release of their 10-Year Capital Plan containing $36 billion in community and regional infrastructure investments across the B.C.\u00a0 This new plan represents an increase of about 50 per cent in investments over the previous capital plans and reflects the province\u2019s growing demand for electricity over time from residential, commercial, transportation and industrial sectors.\u00a0 The plan proposes spending approximately $9.4 billion on electrification and greenhouse gas reduction, $5.3 billion to address load growth and increased customer connections, and $21 billion to sustain existing capital assets, dam safety and reliability.<\/p><p><strong>23.\u00a0 Is there a separate (non-treaty) agreement with the U.S. to provide additional water beyond the treaty requirements?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro\u2019s operations in the Columbia Basin are governed by the terms of the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 The Columbia River Treaty requires Canada to hold back water during wet years and release more water during dry years.\u00a0 BC Hydro is legally required to release this water to the U.S., no more or less, except by agreement with the U.S.<\/p><p>Mica Dam has 12 million acre-feet (MAF) of live reservoir storage of which only 7 MAF is coordinated under the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 The Non-Treaty Storage Agreement (NTSA) coordinates the use of 5 MAF of storage with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).\u00a0 The NTSA is implemented by altering the release and storage of water from Arrow by mutual agreement.\u00a0 This allows the parties to increase or decrease discharges across the U.S.\/Canada border in addition to those required by the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>The NTSA provides BC Hydro more control over reservoir levels.\u00a0 Since the agreement was signed, BC Hydro and BPA have made good use of NTSA flexibility to reduce high and low water impacts downstream of Arrow Lakes Reservoir and to improve power and non-power benefits for both countries.<\/p><p>The severe drought conditions observed in 2023, combined with Columbia River Treaty requirements, resulted in very low levels on Arrow Lakes Reservoir during the second half of the summer and into the fall.\u00a0 In order to minimize impacts to Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels, BC Hydro utilized storage under NTSA in May during the peak of spring run-off to reduce Treaty releases from Arrow Lakes Reservoir to support higher Arrow levels.\u00a0 This operation resulted in the reservoir being up to 2.4 metres (8 feet) higher from May through August.\u00a0 The water was released by mid-August as per the agreement with the U.S. to meet U.S. fisheries objectives.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10157\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10157\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10157\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Contact Us<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10157\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Province of B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team <a href=\"mailto:columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca\">columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">website<\/a><\/p><p>BC Hydro <a href=\"mailto:southern-interior.info@bchydro.com\">southern-interior.info@bchydro.com<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bchydro.com\">website<\/a><\/p><p>To receive updates on the Columbia River Treaty, subscribe to the B.C. Columbia River Treaty <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/sign-up\/\">newsletter<\/a> and follow the B.C. Columbia River Treaty on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ColumbiaRiverTreaty\">Facebook<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CRTreaty\">Twitter\/X<\/a>, all of which share information on developments in Treaty negotiations and future engagement opportunities.\u00a0 Updates are also posted on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\">B.C. Columbia River Treaty website<\/a>.\u00a0 Recordings and materials from past public information sessions can be found on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/info-sessions\/\">Information Sessions page<\/a> of the site.<\/p><p>To receive updates on BC Hydro reservoir elevations and other information related to Columbia River hydro operations, email <a href=\"mailto:southern-interior.info@bchydro.com\">southern-interior.info@bchydro.com<\/a> and indicate whether you would like to receive updates on Upper Columbia operations (including Kinbasket and Arrow Lakes Reservoirs, and Revelstoke Dam) and\/or Lower Columbia operations (including Arrow Lakes and Duncan Reservoirs, and Kootenay Lake.)<\/p><p>To learn more about the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, visit their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">website<\/a>. Questions for the committee can be emailed to <a href=\"mailto:info@crtlgc.ca\">info@crtlgc.ca<\/a>.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10147\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10147\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10147\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Comments<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10147\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>An online survey was issued to attendees after the session and 30 responses were received.\u00a0 The following comments are representative of the range of feedback received:<\/p><ul><li>There needs to be more public engagement to reduce disenfranchisement of Arrow Lake residents.<\/li><li>Good and very informational. Appreciated the diversity of content.<\/li><li>Some information was too technical for a general audience.<\/li><li>BC Hydro was well represented in the session with facts and knowledge.<\/li><li>Spend more time on answering questions and less time on reviewing background information.<\/li><li>A comparison of previous low water years would help put this year\u2019s levels in context.<\/li><li>This time, felt like concerns were being seriously considered.<\/li><li>The depth of representation was good. Need to acknowledge the many issues that residents of Arrow Lakes are facing and detail specific follow up actions.<\/li><li>Appreciate the passion of the Columbia River Treaty negotiating team and the adjusted focus on environmental and ecosystem issues. They need to be firm in holding their ground on these issues.<\/li><li>Help residents make the connection between the impacts they are seeing and the obligations of the Treaty.<\/li><li>Now understand why water hasn\u2019t been released into Arrow to maintain levels.<\/li><li>Develop more simple visuals to explain how, when and why water moves between reservoirs.<\/li><li>Hold more regular update sessions like this.<\/li><li>Allow questions to be submitted in advance, and answered in simple, bulleted, single slides.<\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2786\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2786\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2786\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is BC Hydro\u2019s role in the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2786\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>BC Hydro is the Canadian Entity responsible for the implementation of the Columbia River Treaty and the operator of the Columbia River Treaty dams in Canada.<\/p><p>BC Hydro is working closely with the Ministry of Energy and Mines Columbia River Treaty Review Team and is providing technical support to the Columbia River Treaty review process.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2781\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2781\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2781\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Were First Nations consulted as part of the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2781\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>First Nation consultation is a key component of the Columbia River Treaty Review and was\u00a0a separate\u00a0government-to-government consultation process with each First Nation. The Province is continuing to engage with First Nations on the future of the Treaty.<\/p><p>Canada and BC have signed an Memorandum of Understanding to coordinate Aboriginal consultations as part of the Review. This consultation process helped inform Canada and BC\u2019s recommendations to decision makers.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9977\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9977\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-9977\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Terms of the current Columbia River Treaty<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-9977\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>24.\u00a0 Could have provided more clarification about why the current terms that result in low lake levels cannot be changed yet (explanation of negotiation process). People may not have made the connection between the impacts they see in person and the obligations of the Treaty.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> The Columbia River Treaty is a legally binding, international agreement between Canada and the United States.\u00a0 Under the current Columbia River Treaty, Canada (B.C.) is required to provide a certain volume of water to the U.S.\u00a0 throughout the year for flood-risk management purposes and downstream hydropower generation.\u00a0 This last requirement is the factor that contributed to the severe drafting on Arrow Lakes Reservoir this year.\u00a0 Canada is required to release more water during dry conditions in the U.S. to enable the U.S. to meet their firm energy requirements.<\/p><p>As Canada and the U.S. seek to negotiate a modernized Treaty, Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are strongly advocating for improvements in the Treaty that would reduce the type of impacts seen on Arrow Lakes Reservoir last year.\u00a0 The Canadian and U.S. negotiating teams are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries.<\/p><p>One of the key goals for the Canadian negotiating team is to gain more flexibility for how B.C.\u00a0 operates its Treaty dams.\u00a0 The additional flexibility would allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S. \u00a0There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that research includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also seeking to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p>However, until a modernized Columbia River Treaty is in place, B.C. must continue to meet its legal requirements under the current Treaty.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>25.\u00a0 What is the annual financial intake to the BC government regarding the Columbia River Treaty? Also, what is the projected financial contribution from this year\u2019s water discharge?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Revenue from the sale of the downstream power benefits, also known as the Canadian Entitlement, has generated an average of between $150 and $200 million per year.\u00a0 In fiscal year 2022\/23, because of high market prices in the U.S., the total was $437 million.<\/p><p>The Canadian Entitlement is half of the additional potential hydroelectric power that could be produced in the U.S. as a result of how B.C. operates its Treaty dams.\u00a0 It is calculated in advance using formulas included in the Treaty.\u00a0 The U.S. returns this power to Canada in the form of electricity at the Canada-U.S. border.\u00a0 Powerex, the marketing and trading subsidiary of BC Hydro, sells the Canadian Entitlement at market value to either BC Hydro or utilities in the United States.<\/p><p>Total annual revenue is paid to the Province\u2019s Consolidated Revenue Fund and depends on the price of power on the market.\u00a0 The Canadian Entitlement&#8217;s financial contribution to the Province will only be known at fiscal year-end, that is after March 31, 2024.\u00a0 Then the information is made public every year.<\/p><p><strong>26.\u00a0 What about the water that the U.S. uses that is not used for power? What is being paid for that water, that we can&#8217;t have?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> The current Treaty includes provisions for power generation and flood risk management only.\u00a0 Outside of these provisions, both Canada and the U.S. can use water on their side of the border for domestic purposes.\u00a0 If the U.S. doesn&#8217;t use the Treaty flows for power, they still need to deliver the Canadian Entitlement.<\/p><p><strong>27.\u00a0 Does the Site C Dam have any impact on the future water management of the CRT?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Site C will not have an impact on BC Hydro\u2019s obligations under the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 Once Site C is operational, it will provide BC Hydro with a new resource to meet its growing load.\u00a0 It may, at times, provide additional flexibility to help manage unusual conditions across BC Hydro\u2019s system.<\/p><p><strong>28.\u00a0 does the Treaty require Canada to send water to the U.S. during dry periods and not keep it here?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong>The Columbia River Treaty is operated for power generation and flood control objectives.\u00a0 Under the terms of the Treaty, Canada is required to release more water during dry conditions in the U.S. to enable the U.S. to meet their firm energy requirements.\u00a0 There is no provision for Canada to reduce flows under drought conditions.<\/p><p>BC Hydro\u2019s obligation is to operate the Columbia system under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 Although BC Hydro can take steps to minimize impacts, such as holding back flows last spring, they cannot prevent low levels due to drought conditions.<\/p><p><strong>29.\u00a0 I would like to see the Treaty language and numbers that direct BC to send more water to the U.S. during dry conditions. Is it by water levels, temp, etc.?\u00a0 The August drawdown was somewhat extreme&#8230;\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Can you please define the section of the current CRT which states BC Hydro needs to release MORE water to the U.S.A. during dry conditions as Darren Sherbot stated in his presentation?\u00a0 Thank you.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The Columbia River Treaty is operated for power generation and flood control objectives.\u00a0 Under the terms of the Treaty, Canada is required to release more water during dry conditions in the U.S. to enable the U.S. to meet their firm energy requirements for load.\u00a0 BC Hydro is legally required to release this water to the U.S., no more or less, except by agreement with the U.S.<\/p><p>A general overview of obligations can be found in the Columbia River Treaty 2014\/2020 Review (July 2010) at <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2021\/01\/Phase-1-Report-Appendices-July-2010.pdf\">Phase-1-Report-Appendices-July-2010.pdf (gov.bc.ca)<\/a>.\u00a0 \u00a0For specific references to Proportional Draft see A-26.<\/p><p><strong>30.\u00a0 Why are we required to release more water the dryer it is?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>One statement made but not fully explained was that in dryer conditions Hydro is forced to send MORE water to the USA.\u00a0 Why?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The Columbia River Treaty is operated for power generation and flood control objectives.\u00a0 Under the terms of the Treaty, BC Hydro is required to release more water to the U.S. during dry conditions to meet U.S. power objectives. \u00a0Because Arrow Lakes Reservoir has no significant power generation (less than 1% of BC Hydro\u2019s total generation) it is drafted before the other reservoirs.<\/p><p><strong>31.\u00a0 So the lower mainland gets all our water for power? No that does not help.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro operates its integrated system, which includes all the province (not just the Lower Mainland), under required licence and Treaty obligations, including Water Use Plan objectives, in consideration of providing reliable energy and minimizing costs to ratepayers.<\/p><p>For further clarification, while there is a small generating station adjacent to the Hugh L.\u00a0 Keenleyside Dam, water released from Arrow Lakes Reservoir via the Arrow Lakes Generating Station does not contribute a significant amount of power to the integrated system (less than 1% of BC Hydro\u2019s total generation).\u00a0 All the major generation is upstream at Mica Generating Station and Revelstoke Generating Station.\u00a0 Water released from Arrow Lakes Reservoir is to meet the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, not for power generation.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10017\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10017\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10017\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Operating reservoirs in drought conditions<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10017\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>40.\u00a0 Is there an additional and separate agreement in addition to the Treaty Agreement between Canada and the U.S. to provide water to the U.S.? If so, given the drought and global warming how long does this agreement extend and do we need to renew this agreement when it comes up for renewal?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> BC Hydro\u2019s operations in the Columbia Basin are governed by the terms of the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 The Columbia River Treaty requires Canada to hold back water during wet years and release more water during dry years.\u00a0 BC Hydro is legally required to release this water to the U.S., no more or less, except by agreement with the U.S.<\/p><p>Mica Dam has 12 million acre-feet (MAF) of live water storage of which only 7 MAF is coordinated under the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 The Non-Treaty Storage Agreement (NTSA) coordinates the use of 5 MAF of storage with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).\u00a0 The NTSA is implemented by altering the release and storage of water from Arrow by mutual agreement.\u00a0 This allows the parties to increase or decrease water releases across the U.S.\/Canada border in addition to those required by the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>The current NTSA was signed by BC Hydro and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) in 2012 and remains in effect until 2024.\u00a0 The NTSA provides BC Hydro more control over reservoir levels, more energy benefits to B.C., and more operating flexibility to balance competing non-power interests on the Columbia system.\u00a0 These interests include recreational activities, wildlife habitat, and fisheries.\u00a0 Since the agreement was signed, BC Hydro and BPA have made good use of NTSA flexibility to reduce high and low water impacts downstream of Arrow Lakes Reservoir and to improve power and non-power benefits for both countries.<\/p><p>Last year\u2019s severe drought conditions, combined with Columbia River Treaty requirements, resulted in very low levels on the Arrow Lakes Reservoir during the second half of the summer and into the fall.\u00a0 In order to minimize impacts to Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels, BC Hydro used storage under NTSA in May during the peak of spring water runoff to reduce Treaty releases from Arrow Lakes Reservoir in order to support higher Arrow levels.\u00a0 This operation resulted in the reservoir being 2.4 metres (8 feet) higher from May through August.\u00a0 The water was released by mid-August as per the agreement with the U.S. to meet U.S. fisheries objectives.<\/p><p><strong>41.\u00a0 Will the next Treaty include a provision to reduce outflows from Arrow Lake during droughts? It seems this is a serious oversight in the current Treaty.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>Though the specifics of negotiations are confidential, it can be shared that the Canadian and U.S. negotiating teams are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wider range of interests in both countries.<\/p><p>One of the priorities for the Canadian team is to gain increased flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated, including the Hugh L. Keenleyside dam.\u00a0 The additional flexibility would allow to adjust operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also aiming to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>42.\u00a0 So regardless of our situation, drought etc., we have to send the water? We have no out?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Until a modernized Columbia River Treaty is in place, Canada must continue to meet its legal Treaty obligations, which include releasing a certain volume to the U.S. throughout the year for flood risk management and power generation purposes, including during times of drought.<\/p><p>Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are strongly advocating for improvements to the Columbia River Treaty to reduce the types of impacts seen on Arrow Lakes last year.<\/p><p>One of the priorities for the Canadian team is to gain increased flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated, including the Hugh L. Keenleyside dam.\u00a0 The additional flexibility will allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.<\/p><p>There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also aiming to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p><strong>43.\u00a0 The drought conversation is good and for future but that does not answer why Kootenay Lake levels going through Keenleyside were not nearly as affected as Arrow lakes. That does not fly, please answer that question.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> Kootenay Lake is part of the Kootenay system, not the Columbia system, and discharges downstream of the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam and Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Its levels are not controlled or affected by the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam.\u00a0 The water licence for Arrow Lakes Reservoir allows for operations between 440.1 metres (1,444 feet) and 419.9 metres (1,377.9 feet).\u00a0 The reservoir can be operated up to two feet above its normal maximum level (to 440.7 metres or 1,446 feet) if approved by the Comptroller of Water Rights.\u00a0 In comparison, Kootenay Lake can only fluctuate between 529.7 metres (1,738 feet) and 534 metres (1,752 feet).\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>44.\u00a0 How bad was the drought in Washington and Oregon?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The U.S. also experienced similar dry conditions in the fall\/winter of 2023 and below normal snow accumulation.\u00a0 The 2023 precipitation for the Columbia basin above The Dalles, Oregon in the lower Columbia was 87% of normal.<\/p><p><strong>45.\u00a0 Comment from Information Session participant:<\/strong> <strong>Early snowmelt, a lack of spring rain, and low stream flows prompted Ecology to declare a drought emergency for 12 watersheds in parts of 12 counties. The information below is for water system managers.\u00a0 For general public, visit <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/doh.wa.gov\/community-and-environment\/drinking-water\/drinking-water-emergencies\/drought\"><strong>Ecology&#8217;s 2023 Drought in Washington page<\/strong><\/a><strong>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Response from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Thank you for sharing this information with all concerned.<\/p><p><strong>46.\u00a0 What more can be done in the face of drought and impending extreme drought? Are there reservoir storage capacity options capable of mitigating risk?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Modernizing the Treaty to include more flexibility for B.C. Treaty dam operations and incorporate adaptive management will help mitigate the impacts of future droughts.<\/p><p>The additional flexibility could allow B.C. to adjust its Treaty dam operations to support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.\u00a0 Climate change projections are informing this modelling work.<\/p><p>Incorporating adaptive management into the Treaty will allow both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p>These are two key goals the Canadian negotiating team is working towards including in a modernized Treaty.<\/p><p>There is no plan to increase Columbia River Treaty dam heights to increase storage capacity.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10032\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10032\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10032\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Canada-U.S. negotiations to modernize the Columbia River Treaty<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10032\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>47.\u00a0 Who initiated the opening of the Treaty for negotiation, Canada or the U.S.?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Canada and United States governments jointly decided to enter into negotiations to modernize the Treaty in May 2018.\u00a0 This decision came after frequent communication between Global Affairs Canada, the Province of B.C. and the U.S. Department of State to ensure both countries were in a position to begin negotiating.<\/p><p><strong>48.\u00a0 Why are the Treaty negotiations confidential?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Why are negotiations classified?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Details of negotiations are kept confidential because sharing specifics could compromise either country\u2019s negotiating positions.\u00a0 From the Canadian negotiating team\u2019s perspective, it could affect their ability to secure a modernized Treaty that represents the interests of B.C., Columbia Basin Indigenous Nations and residents.\u00a0 Confidentiality also assists both sides in freely exploring options for modernizing the Treaty, some of which are pursued, some of which are not.<\/p><p>However, there is information about the negotiations that can and is being shared to ensure people in the Basin are kept up to date and understand what is being discussed.\u00a0 The Province of B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team has been engaging with Indigenous Nations, local governments, and residents since 2012 to learn what Treaty-related issues matter to them.\u00a0 The B.C. Treaty team connects with people through in-person and virtual public meetings, social media, emails, phone calls, and letters.\u00a0 Members of the Canadian negotiating team, including Canada\u2019s Lead Negotiator and representatives from the Province of B.C. and Basin Indigenous Nations, attend the public meetings to share updates, answer questions and hear from residents firsthand.<\/p><p>In addition, there are two committees the Canadian negotiating team updates after each round of negotiations \u2013 the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-basin-regional-advisory-committee\/\">Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee<\/a>.\u00a0 These groups consist of members from across the Basin and are providing suggestions and advice on what an improved Treaty could look like.<\/p><p>Recordings of virtual sessions and reports from past community engagement meetings are available on the Province of B.C. website.\u00a0 The latest news about negotiations is also shared regularly through the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">B.C. Columbia River Treaty website<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ColumbiaRiverTreaty\">Facebook<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CRTreaty\">Twitter\/X<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/sign-up\/\">newsletters<\/a> and media releases.<\/p><p>Before any agreement on a modernized Columbia River Treaty is finalized, the Province will return to the Basin to explain what is being proposed and seek feedback, so residents can see how their input is reflected.<\/p><p><strong>49.\u00a0 If there are not elected officials on the board, why would resident input be of any value?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> While there are no elected officials at the Columbia River Treaty negotiating table, the Provincial Government has committed to making sure Basin Indigenous Nations and residents\u2019 interests are reflected in a modernized Treaty.\u00a0 This commitment was made by the Liberal government in 2011 and re-confirmed by the NDP government when they took office in 2017.\u00a0 Global Affairs Canada, as the lead for international treaties, has supported this commitment.\u00a0 As such, Basin Indigenous Nations and resident interests have directly informed what the Canadian negotiation delegation is seeking in its negotiations with the U.S. to modernize the Treaty.<\/p><p>The Province of B.C. Columbia River Treaty team has been engaging with Indigenous Nations, local governments and residents since 2012 to learn what changes they would like to see in a modernized Treaty.\u00a0 The B.C. Treaty team connects with people through in-person and virtual public meetings, social media, emails, phone calls, and letters.\u00a0 Members of the Canadian negotiating team, including Canada\u2019s Lead Negotiator and representatives from the Province of B.C. and Basin Indigenous Nations, attend the public meetings to share updates, answer questions and hear from residents firsthand.\u00a0 The B.C. Treaty Team has also received regular input from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-basin-regional-advisory-committee\/\">Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee<\/a> \u2013 two groups with representatives from impacted areas across the Basin.\u00a0 Recordings of virtual sessions and reports from past community engagement meetings are available on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">Province of B.C. website<\/a>.<\/p><p>Input received through this process has been guiding the Canadian negotiation delegation\u2019s efforts to ensure a modernized Treaty: supports ecosystem health, salmon restoration, Indigenous cultural values, and social and economic interests; is able to adapt to future unknowns, like the effects of climate change; and continues to protect communities from damaging floods and enable generation of clean hydroelectricity.\u00a0 Before any agreement is finalized, the Province will return to the Basin to explain what is being proposed and seek feedback.<\/p><p><strong>50.\u00a0 But Minister Conroy has stated that she has no power to affect negotiations?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> While Minister Conroy is not at the negotiating table, she is responsible for ensuring that B.C.\u2019s interests are represented as part of the negotiations.\u00a0 The Minister is briefed regularly on the progress of negotiations by the B.C. Treaty Team and provides feedback and advice.\u00a0 She is also in frequent contact with federal and First Nations leaders to discuss what needs to change.\u00a0 She will lead the review of any agreement-in-principle at the provincial Cabinet table.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>51.\u00a0 Once the Treaty is signed, how long for ratification?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The timeline is to be determined.\u00a0 Once an agreement-in-principle for a modernized Treaty is reached at the negotiating table, there are different processes in both countries that will take place.\u00a0 In B.C., this includes engaging with Basin Indigenous Nations, local governments and residents to explain what the agreement-in-principle includes and seek feedback.\u00a0 Legal drafting of Treaty text will also be underway.\u00a0 There are also processes that will happen within the B.C. government, as well as Canadian and U.S.\u00a0 federal governments.\u00a0 The mechanism to ratify a modernized Treaty will depend on the scope and extent of proposed changes to the current agreement.\u00a0 In Canada, changes to the Treaty can be approved by the executive branch of the federal government after debate in parliament.<\/p><p><strong>52.\u00a0 Can you elaborate on the hard points in negotiations with what the U.S. wants that will hurt us the most?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Specific negotiating points from either country cannot be shared due to negotiations confidentiality.\u00a0 However, what can be shared is that the U.S. is seeking certainty around flood risk management to continue to be able to rely on Canada\u2019s help to avoid or reduce damaging floods, as has been the case for the last 60 years.\u00a0 The U.S. also wishes to maintain reliable predictable firm electricity generation that is amplified by Treaty power coordination.\u00a0 Much of the bilateral discussions involve salmon, including reintroduction of salmon into the Canadian basin.<\/p><p>Both countries may perceive the value of these Treaty benefits differently which is part of the ongoing negotiations.<\/p><p><strong>53.\u00a0 What happens if our governments cannot come to reasonable terms on the Treaty? Can we be assured that the treaty will not be signed unless it is in the best interest of Canada?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>How militant&#8230;what are our options&#8230;\u00a0 if the U.S. doesn&#8217;t want to meet our demands?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> If Canada and the U.S cannot reach agreement on a modernized Treaty, the Treaty continues in its current form, except for the Flood Risk Management provisions which expire in fall of 2024. \u00a0In addition, either country can issue a 10-year termination notice.<\/p><p>Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations have been clear with the U.S. that a modernized Treaty must reduce the impacts B.C. Basin communities and ecosystems have been experiencing since the Treaty came into force.\u00a0 The Canadian negotiation delegation\u2019s proposals for a modernized Treaty reflect this, and the delegation won\u2019t support an agreement unless it leads to fewer impacts in the B.C. Basin.<\/p><p><strong>54.\u00a0 Conversation is heard that the U.S.A. wants to eliminate Canadian entitlement. If so, what is Canada\u2019s alternative to make up this revenue\/power shortfall?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The U.S. is seeking to \u201crebalance\u201d the Canadian Entitlement at the negotiation table and Canada is seeking a fair and equitable share of the Treaty benefits, including the Canadian Entitlement.\u00a0 Further details of the negotiations are confidential until an agreement-in-principle is reached, which will be shared with Basin residents.<\/p><p><strong>55. Once a Treaty is in place how can we change it after? Isn&#8217;t it the time to make changes before the Treaty is reached?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Treaty can be changed at any time as long as there is mutual agreement between countries.\u00a0 In addition, the Canadian negotiating team is seeking to incorporate adaptive management into a modernized Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to new information and future unknowns, such as the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and technological advancements.<\/p><p>Further to this, B.C. is seeking greater flexibility in order to be able to make changes in the Canadian portion of the Columbia Basin even once a modernized Treaty is in place.<\/p><p><strong>56.\u00a0 What are the consequences if Canada or U.S. decided to break the Treaty? How long does it take for that to happen?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Each country is required under international law to meet its requirements under the Treaty.\u00a0 Either country can terminate the Treaty with 10 years notice if it does not wish to continue.<\/p><p><strong>57.\u00a0 Dear heart, you\u2019ve been talking for 10 years, negotiating for 5 years and here we sit. Could we get someone to the table capable of actually addressing the issues we face?\u00a0 Flood control, here\u2019s hoping.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Negotiations have taken time because there are many interests to consider.\u00a0 Both countries are taking the time they time to improve on a 60-year-old Treaty in high need of renewal.\u00a0 Each delegation is negotiating hard to ensure that a modernized Treaty will satisfactorily meet both country\u2019s interests so that it will endure.\u00a0 An expedited agreement may not be the best for B.C.<\/p><p>For the Canadian negotiation delegation, that means modernizing the Treaty to reflect the interests of Basin Indigenous Nations, local governments and residents.\u00a0 Through technical studies, river management modelling, partnership with Indigenous Nations, and engagement with Basin local governments and residents, the delegation is exploring how a modernized Treaty can support ecosystem health, salmon restoration, Indigenous cultural values, and social and economic interests, while continuing to protect communities from damaging floods and enable generation of clean hydroelectricity to power homes and businesses.\u00a0 Before any agreement is finalized, the Province of B.C. Treaty team will engage with the people of the Basin to explain what is being proposed and seek feedback.<\/p><p><strong>58.\u00a0 Who decided that the Treaty cannot be cancelled? At many meetings the residents asked why, and years later we still do not have an answer.<br \/><\/strong><\/p><p><strong>And another asked what if the U.S does not to play ball and when you say can&#8217;t change immediately, do you mean this round for 2024, or another 25 years?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> If Canada and the U.S cannot reach agreement on a modernized Treaty, the Treaty continues in its present for except for the Flood Risk Management provisions which expire in fall 2024. \u00a0Either country can terminate the Treaty at any time, with 10 years notice.<\/p><p><strong>59.\u00a0 Why would the U.S. give up their very lucrative deal? What are you offering the U.S. to get them to give up their enviable deal?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Though the details of negotiations are confidential, what can be shared is that both countries currently see value in modernizing the Treaty, which is why negotiations are underway instead of letting the Treaty continue as is or terminating it.\u00a0 These negotiations provide an opportunity for both countries to update the Treaty in a way that reflects the values and interests of today \u2013 to incorporate ecosystems, salmon reintroduction and adaptive management, update flood risk management and hydro power provisions, and discuss compensation that reflects a fair and equitable sharing of benefits.<\/p><p>Both countries may perceive the value of these Treaty benefits differently which is part of the ongoing negotiations.<\/p><p><strong>60.\u00a0 Thank-you for your individual presentations. When and where will the next formal round of CRT negotiations take place?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The next round of negotiations has not been scheduled.\u00a0 The Canadian and U.S. teams are holding virtual intersessional meetings to work through outstanding issues.<\/p><p><strong>61.\u00a0 How concerned is the current negotiating committee with the potential return of a Republican-led government in 2024 that may discount climate change or only be looking for &#8216;the best deal&#8217; for the U.S.A.?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Canada is negotiating with the current U.S.\u00a0 administration.\u00a0 The course of negotiations to modernize the Treaty have not changed throughout the last three U.S. administrations.<\/p><p><strong>62.\u00a0 Are you able to convey to the audience some of the concerns your American counterparts have?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> While the details of negotiations are confidential, what can be shared is that the U.S. is seeking certainty around flood risk management to continue to be able to rely on Canada\u2019s help to avoid or reduce damaging floods, as has been the case for the last 60 years.\u00a0 The reliable or \u201cassured\u201d flood control provision changes in September 2024 to a more ad hoc called upon approach, which would require the U.S. to draft their reservoirs deeper before calling on Canada for additional storage.<\/p><p>The U.S. is also wanting to maintain reliable predictable firm electricity generation that is amplified by Treaty power coordination.\u00a0 Both countries are also looking to collaborate on Columbia salmon populations, including the return of salmon in the Canadian Columbia Basin.<\/p><p>Both countries may perceive the value of these Treaty benefits differently which is certainly part of the ongoing negotiations.<\/p><p><strong>63.\u00a0 Once an agreement in principle is reached, will it then go to the politicians for debate\/approval?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Once an agreement-in-principle for a modernized Treaty is reached at the negotiating table, there are different processes in both countries that will take place.\u00a0 In B.C., this includes engaging with Basin Indigenous Nations, local governments and residents to explain what the agreement-in-principle includes and seek feedback.\u00a0 Legal drafting of Treaty text will also be underway.\u00a0 There are also processes that will happen within the B.C. government, as well as Canadian and U.S. federal governments.\u00a0 The mechanism to ratify a modernized Treaty will depend on the scope and extent of proposed changes to the current agreement.\u00a0 In Canada, changes to the Treaty can be approved by the executive branch of the federal government after debate in parliament.\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>64.\u00a0 You have been negotiating for years with no information on issues or results! Is there a list of issues, have ANY of them been solved, and if they have what are the results?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>The Province of B.C. has been providing public updates since negotiations began, through media releases, the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">B.C. Treaty website<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ColumbiaRiverTreaty\">Facebook<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CRTreaty\">Twitter\/X<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/sign-up\/\">newsletter<\/a>.\u00a0 Updates have also been provided through virtual and in person public meetings.\u00a0 The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-basin-regional-advisory-committee\/\">Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee<\/a> receive updates after each round of negotiations.<\/p><p>The main issues being discussed as part of Canada-U.S. negotiations to modernize the Treaty are outlined in B.C.\u2019s media releases: modernizing the Treaty to include considerations for ecosystems, salmon restoration, power generation, flood risk management, increased flexibility for Canadian Treaty dam operations, which will enable B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests like recreation and tourism in B.C., and increased coordination of Libby dam operations.<\/p><p>While Canada and the U.S. are getting closer to agreement on many issues, the Canadian negotiating team has maintained that there is no agreement unless everything is agreed to.\u00a0 This is what they are working towards and will share with Basin residents once a draft agreement-in-principle is reached.<\/p><p><strong>65.\u00a0 Is there a posted location where we can view updates with Treaty negotiations? Transparency would be appreciated.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Province of B.C. issues a media release after each round of negotiations, which are posted to the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">B.C. Columbia River Treaty website<\/a> and shared via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ColumbiaRiverTreaty\">Facebook<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CRTreaty\">Twitter\/X<\/a>.<\/p><p>You can also sign up to receive the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/sign-up\/\">B.C. Columbia River Treaty newsletter<\/a> and read past editions to learn about the process since negotiations began.<\/p><p><strong>66.\u00a0 If a new agreement is agreed to, will it be another 60 years before it can be changed again? 10 years would be rational!<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>What is the projected duration of the new Treaty? 10 years?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Those details are still being negotiated.\u00a0 There is recognition on both sides that a 60-year term is too long.<\/p><p>Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are aiming to incorporate an adaptive management framework into a modernized Treaty, to help ensure the agreement is flexible and can accommodate future changes in climate, technology, environmental conditions, and Indigenous and societal objectives.<\/p><p>It\u2019s also worth noting that even though the original Treaty has a minimum term of 60 years, the Treaty can be changed at any time as long as there is mutual agreement between countries.<\/p><p><strong>67.\u00a0 When did the new talks begin?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Negotiations between Canada and the U.S. to modernize the Columbia River Treaty began in May 2018.<\/p><p><strong>68.\u00a0 Where are negotiations hosted?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Canada and the U.S. take turns hosting rounds of negotiations in locations alternating between the two countries.\u00a0 Canada has hosted its in-person rounds in B.C. and, when possible, in the B.C. Columbia Basin.\u00a0 Canadian rounds have been held in Nelson, Vancouver, Victoria, ?aq\u2019am (near Cranbrook), Kelowna, and Richmond.\u00a0 U.S. rounds have been held in Washington D.C., Portland, Spokane and Seattle.\u00a0 Several rounds were held virtually in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.\u00a0 Intersessional meetings are occurring virtually for the delegations to make further progress on technical issues.<\/p><p><strong>69.\u00a0 How often are they occurring?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> On average, official in-person negotiating rounds have been occurring every 2 \u2013 3 months.\u00a0 The teams also meet between the rounds for numerous technical and virtual intersessional meetings.\u00a0 The frequency of these meetings has increased over the past year due to the desire to reach an agreement-in-principle on a modernized Treaty in a timely manner.\u00a0 There were five formal negotiating rounds in 2023 and, since the most recent round in October 2023, the teams have been holding virtual intersessional meetings to make further progress.<\/p><p><strong>70.\u00a0 How is your group funded?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Government of British Columbia funds its engagement in the negotiation process.\u00a0 The Columbia River Treaty is the responsibility of the Minister of Finance, who is also the Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty, Columbia Power Corporation and Columbia Basin Trust.\u00a0 The funding for the Columbia River Treaty team is part of the Ministry of Finance budget and is recovered from the Canadian Entitlement.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>71.\u00a0 Is there a timeline as to when they will be concluded with a new agreement ready for approval?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> There is no deadline for these negotiations to conclude.\u00a0 While the Canadian negotiating team \u2013 which includes Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations \u2013 is actively working with the U.S. to secure agreement on a modernized Treaty as soon as possible, they are not willing to sacrifice objectives in exchange for a quick but unbalanced Treaty.\u00a0 The delegation is working hard to reach an agreement that lays the groundwork for an equitable Treaty that meets the B.C. Basin\u2019s interests as well as U.S. interests.<\/p><p><strong>72.\u00a0 Will there be an expiration date on the new Treaty?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The duration of a modernized Treaty is still being negotiated.\u00a0 Canada, B.C. and Indigenous Nations are seeking to incorporate adaptive management into a modernized Treaty, to help ensure the agreement is flexible and can accommodate future changes in climate, technology, environmental conditions, and Indigenous and societal objectives.\u00a0 It\u2019s also worth noting that the Treaty can be modified at any time as long as both countries agree.<\/p><p><strong>73.\u00a0 Negotiate with the best interests of this valley at the top of the list. Don\u2019t let greed and ignorance produce a disaster again.\u00a0 Don\u2019t sign a 60 year treaty, take baby steps and get it right this time.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Canada, B.C. and indigenous Nations are committed to negotiating an improved Treaty that supports the Basin\u2019s Indigenous and public communities and ecosystems, now and into the future.\u00a0 There are many interests to consider, and the Canadian negotiation delegation is taking the time to get it right.<\/p><p>The duration of a modernized Treaty is still being negotiated.\u00a0 Canada, B.C. and Indigenous Nations are seeking to incorporate adaptive management into a modernized Treaty, to help ensure the agreement is flexible and can accommodate future changes in climate, technology, environmental conditions, and Indigenous and societal objectives.\u00a0 It\u2019s also worth noting that the Treaty can be modified at any time as long as both countries agree.<\/p><p><strong>74.\u00a0 It would be appreciated to know the actual Treaty negotiations status, and what can be anticipated.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Negotiating teams have made significant progress towards an agreement-in-principle for a modernized Treaty.\u00a0 The last round of negotiations was held in Portland Oregon on October 12 \u2013 13, 2023 where the teams made progress on operational and other issues.\u00a0 While there is not currently another in-person negotiating round scheduled, both teams are meeting virtually for intersessional meetings to work through outstanding issues.<\/p><p>Once an agreement-in-principle is reached B.C. will engage with people in the Basin to explain what is being proposed and seek feedback.<\/p><p><strong>75.\u00a0 The lack of ability to put any timeframe to the conclusion of negotiations just makes it appear as though there is no incentive to complete the negotiations, and that they are likely to go on for years to come.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> There are incentives for both countries to reach an agreement in a timely manner.\u00a0 Key pressures in the U.S. include the flood risk management provisions that are changing in September 2024.\u00a0 For Canada, we want to reach an agreement the reduces the impacts to B.C. Basin residents, ecosystems and economies.\u00a0 Both countries want to address environmental considerations, including salmon.<\/p><p>From the Canadian negotiating team\u2019s perspective, a modernized Treaty needs to meet the needs of the B.C. Basin and will take the time to get it right. \u00a0However, much progress has been made and both negotiating teams are working hard towards an agreement-in-principle.<\/p><p><strong>76.\u00a0 What is the timeframe of the Non-Treaty Storage Agreement, and how does that water factor into both adaptive management and unilateral flexibility?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The NTSA agreement expires in 2024. \u00a0Operations under the NTSA must be mutually agreed to by Canada and the U.S.\u00a0 It is a mechanism to modify the Treaty flows for improved power and non-power operations if it is mutually beneficial to both parties.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10041\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10041\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10041\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Canada\u2019s objectives for a modernized Columbia River Treaty<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10041\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>77.\u00a0 What drawdown level is the negotiating committee working at? We all know that First Nations want salmon to return, this will need a steady lake level. \u00a0Why does the Arrow Lakes valley carry all the &#8220;drought&#8221; pain as the U.S. dams are full and Kootenay Lake is normal?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> In addition to drought, one reason that the Arrow Lakes Reservoir was drafted deeper than Kinbasket Reservoir was to preserve water behind Mica and Revelstoke dams that can generate 5,500 megawatts (MW) of electricity whereas Arrow Lakes Generating Station generates 185 MW.\u00a0 BC Hydro also bought $500 million worth of electricity from the U.S. last year to reduce summer generation at Mica and Revelstoke dams and to maintain Kinbasket Reservoir elevations.\u00a0 Those two measures combined, ensured that BC Hydro could meet winter customer load, even during record cold spells.\u00a0 It should be noted that Kootenay Lake is not dam controlled.<\/p><p>Where the Columbia River Treaty is concerned, specific details of negotiations are confidential; however, we can say that the Canadian and U.S. negotiating teams are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries.\u00a0 The management of salmon populations, both existing stocks in the downstream portion of the Columbia but also the reintroduction of salmon in the Upper Columbia in B.C., is also being discussed at the negotiation table.\u00a0 This is a key priority for Canadian Indigenous Nations and U.S. Tribes.<\/p><p>In addition, the Canadian delegation is seeking increased flexibility for how B.C. operates its Treaty dams to better support ecosystems (including fish), Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility. \u00a0Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.\u00a0 It should be noted that prior to the construction of the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam, the natural fluctuation of the Arrow lakes ranged from approximately 1,377 feet (420 metres) to early summer peaks up to 1,409 feet (429.5 metres), a seasonal variation of up to 32 feet.<\/p><p>Another key goal for the Canadian delegation is to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, which will allow both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p>Throughout negotiations, the Canadian delegation has been direct with the U.S. that a modernized Treaty must reduce the type of impacts that have occurred in and around Arrow Lakes over the past year.<\/p><p><strong>78.\u00a0 In the negotiations, which has priority, the needs of the residents along the Arrow Lakes or the needs of the Province?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Canadian negotiating team, which includes Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations, is prioritizing the interests of the Canadian Columbia Basin.\u00a0 The Canadian team\u2019s proposals for a modernized Treaty have been directly informed by over a decade of engagement with Indigenous Nations, local governments, and residents across the Basin, primarily in communities impacted by the Columbia River Treaty, including those around Arrow Lakes.<\/p><p>This engagement has led to the Canadian team negotiating a Treaty that better supports ecosystem health, salmon restoration, local tourism, recreation and navigation, while continuing to enable clean power generation and provide flood protection for communities such as Castlegar and Trail.<\/p><p><strong>79.\u00a0 Is there going to be a rehabilitation program in the works to restore our ecosystem?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Projects to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife populations in the Columbia River watershed impacted by BC Hydro dams will continue to be funded through the ongoing work of the Fish &amp; Wildlife Compensation Program delivered in partnership between First Nations, the Province, BC Hydro, and the public.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> In addition, there is substantial research being led by Indigenous Nations in collaboration with provincial and federal agencies and consultants to explore how ecosystems can be improved through the Treaty.\u00a0 Different scenarios are being modelled to see how different reservoir levels and river flows will affect a range of ecosystem values.\u00a0 The increased flexibility being negotiated will allow for adjustments to operations to support ecosystem health, as well as Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests.<\/p><p><strong>80.\u00a0 In the near future<\/strong><strong>, fresh water will become valuable as gold. Is the Canadian freshwater contribution in the CRT future to be commoditized?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The commodification of freshwater is not, and will not be, an element of the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p><strong>81.\u00a0 The new\/revised Treaty needs to include that if we are low, any increase in water should be no more than equal water levels in the U.S. and Canada. Is that being pursued?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Though the details of negotiations are confidential as discussions are still underway, what can be shared is that the Canadian and U.S. negotiating teams are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries.<\/p><p>The Canadian negotiating team is acutely aware of the impacts that have occurred in and around Arrow Lakes this year and has been direct with the U.S. that a modernized Treaty must reduce these impacts in the future.<\/p><p><strong>82.\u00a0 What would be the worst case scenario if Canada chose to curtail water flows sent to the U.S. to ensure the preservation of our ecosystem?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Canada, and B.C. as the implementing entity, would be in breach of an international treaty and could be sued all the way up to the International Court of Justice.<\/p><p><strong>83.\u00a0 If a more constant lake level was agreed upon in the new Treaty (say 20\u2019 fluctuations) what would the downsides be as far as flood control and power generation?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>There could be implications for both flood control and power generation, although the latter would depend on timing and quantity of water at the border, i.e. management of flows originating from the Kootenay system or Kinbasket in addition to Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><p>Arrow Lakes used to fluctuate up to 32 feet so keeping it constant is not a natural operation, but the Canadian negotiating team is looking at how the system can be operated to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests such as recreation and tourism, while continuing to support power generation and flood protection.<\/p><p>River management scenario modelling is being conducted to inform the Canadian team\u2019s discussions about how operations could be adjusted.\u00a0 There is substantial research underway to determine objectives for this modelling process being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial government, Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p><strong>84.\u00a0 Is food security in the valley and ability to irrigate being taken into account?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> While irrigation in the B.C. Basin is not part of Treaty modernization, the Treaty does enable both countries to use water for their own domestic purposes, which includes irrigation.<\/p><p>Throughout the Province\u2019s public engagement on the Columbia River Treaty, Basin residents have spoken of agricultural losses sustained when valley bottoms were first inundated after construction of the Treaty dams.\u00a0 \u00a0Many people have indicated that increased support is needed for areas such as accessing land, financial aid for sustainable farming, irrigation, and dikes.<\/p><p>To help respond to these concerns, the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team investigated existing federal, provincial and regional agriculture programs and initiatives with the potential to help address some of the interests.\u00a0 The findings were collated in a <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-river-treaty-agriculture-discussion-paper\/\">discussion paper<\/a> published on the B.C. Columbia River Treaty website for public input in the summer of 2021.<\/p><p><strong>85.\u00a0 In future will the levels still go down in winter months?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Water levels in Arrow Lakes Reservoir will still go down in winter months, primarily to provide flood control under the Treaty for the U.S. but also to protect Castlegar, Trail and downstream, as we saw was much needed in 2012.<\/p><p>That isn&#8217;t to say that the Arrow Lakes Reservoir will be drafted to the same extent and as frequently in future.\u00a0 The specifics of Canada-U.S. negotiations to modernize the Treaty cannot be shared as discussions are still underway.\u00a0 However, a key goal for the Canadian negotiating team is to add more flexibility in the Treaty for how B.C. operates its Treaty dams. \u00a0The additional flexibility will allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 \u00a0There is river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.\u00a0 Part of this research includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><p><strong>86.\u00a0 Can Keenleyside Dam be converted to a power generation dam which would provide incentive to maintain a higher water level in the Arrow Lakes?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> The Arrow Lakes Generating Station powerhouse, adjacent to the Hugh L.\u00a0 Keenleyside Dam, takes advantage of the existing reservoir and generates power from water that would otherwise be spilled.\u00a0 The power production associated with Arrow Lakes Generation station, however, is quite small relative to the combined generation from Mica and Revelstoke Generation Stations (less than 1% total BC Hydro generation).\u00a0 As a result, operations at Arrow Lakes Generating Station does not materially affect Arrow Lakes Reservoir levels.<\/p><p><strong>87.\u00a0 How will a new Treaty protect Arrow Lake levels when the Keenleyside Dam generates a small percentage of the power? The first drawdown will always be driven by economics which sounds bad for the Keenleyside Dam given the small percentage of power it generates.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>The Arrow Lakes Generating Station powerhouse next to the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam takes advantage of the existing reservoir and generates power from water that would otherwise be spilled.\u00a0 The Arrow Lakes Generating Station has a generating capacity of 185 MW; the Mica and Revelstoke Generating Stations have the ability to generate over 5,000 MW so it is reasonable to assume that this is a consideration, but not the sole consideration, in managing the reservoirs.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>Basin Indigenous Nations and Basin communities have given clear direction to Canada\u2019s negotiating team that ecosystems and Indigenous cultural values must also be considered in the management of reservoirs going forward.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>88.\u00a0 I feel we need to hear more specific examples of changes that are being brought forward to address extreme low water levels in the future.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> There are a number of factors that contributed to the low levels on Arrow Lakes over the past year \u2013 drought, the need for BC Hydro to meet its power demand, and B.C.\u2019s obligations under the Treaty.\u00a0 Where the Treaty is concerned, Canada, B.C., and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc, and Syilx Okanagan Nations are seeking changes to the agreement in their negotiations with U.S., to reduce the types of impacts we\u2019ve seen on Arrow Lakes Reservoir over the past year.<\/p><p>One of the main goals for the Canadian delegation is to gain additional flexibility for how B.C.\u00a0 operates its Treaty dams.\u00a0 This flexibility would allow us to adjust operations (and resulting reservoir levels and river flows) to support riparian, wetland and aquatic ecosystems in the B.C.\u00a0 Basin, along with Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests.<\/p><p>There is river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of this involves looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p><strong>89.\u00a0 What mechanism will you establish to ensure accountability to fisheries, wildlife, and tourism?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Incorporating ecosystems into a modernized Treaty is a priority for both Canada and the U.S.\u00a0 There has been encouraging progress at the negotiating table to determine what transboundary collaboration to enhance ecosystems could look like.<\/p><p>In addition, the increased domestic flexibility the Canadian negotiating team is seeking will help support ecosystems (including fish and wildlife), Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests like tourism.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also seeking to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change, evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.\u00a0 As part of this approach, there will be reporting on how changes in the Treaty are improving conditions in the B.C. Columbia Basin.<\/p><p><strong>90.\u00a0 Will you assure Canadians that you will be as considerate to us as to the U.S.A., regarding water volumes?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Though the specifics of negotiations are confidential, what can be shared is that the Canadian and U.S. negotiating teams are looking at different ways of managing the volume and timing of water releases to support a wide range of interests in both countries.\u00a0 In these conversations, the Canadian delegation is prioritizing the interests of the B.C. Basin.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is acutely aware of the impacts that have occurred in and around Arrow Lakes over the past year and has been direct with the U.S. that a modernized Treaty must reduce these impacts in the future.\u00a0 Before any modernized Treaty is finalized, we will engage with Basin residents to explain what is being proposed and seek feedback.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10047\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10047\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10047\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">First Nations involvement in the Columbia River Treaty<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10047\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>91.\u00a0 Panelists: Would you support expanding the Canadian Entity to include a representative to advocate for environmental and Indigenous cultural issues in Treaty implementation? Additionally, would you support amending the Treaty to allow 3 members from each country to the Permanent Engineering Board to integrate environmental and Indigenous and cultural values in Treaty implementation?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> These issues are part of domestic governance discussions that are occurring between B.C., Canada and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations.<\/p><p>The Negotiation Advisory Team, which advises the Canadian negotiation delegation and includes representatives of Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations, is exploring potential models for Canadian domestic governance in a modernized Treaty.\u00a0 In this process, one of the fundamental principles is that any proposed governance models should be consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.\u00a0 This process is in its early stages and will take time.\u00a0 It will be a collaborative process, including consultation with Basin Indigenous Nations, local governments, and others.\u00a0 More information will be provided as the process progresses.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>92.\u00a0 Who represents the Sinixt people?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>It\u2019s time to include the Sinixt at the table and right the wrong done in the 1950\u2019s when they were declared extinct!<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Also, why are not the Sinixt part of the process?\u00a0 The Arrow Lakes were their home. <\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>In April 2021, the Desautel decision made by the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the Lakes Tribe of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation as a successor to the Sinixt, with Aboriginal rights in the Arrow Lakes region.<\/p><p>The Colville Confederated Tribes are expert-advisors to the U.S. Department of State in the Columbia River Treaty negotiations and are represented in the U.S. negotiating team.\u00a0 They are directly involved in all of the negotiating sessions.\u00a0 As such, B.C. understands their interests are represented at the negotiating table.<\/p><p>The Province is in discussions with Lakes Tribe representatives to determine how they would like to be engaged on several issues \u2013 including Aboriginal Rights and related issues in the Arrow Lakes region.\u00a0 By engaging with the Colville Confederated Tribes to implement the Desautel decision, the provincial government can start to build a greater understanding of how B.C. can consult the Lakes Tribe and build unique relationships with Sinixt peoples.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10137\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10137\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10137\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Other<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10137\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>117.\u00a0 Why were the residents of Burton, Nakusp, Renata, Fauquier, etc. not been consulted or asked for their input for the Treaty negotiations? Why no mail-outs or e-mails?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>Residents from these communities and others around Arrow Lakes have been strong voices throughout the Province\u2019s public engagement on the Treaty.<\/p><p>The B.C. Treaty Team has been engaging with Indigenous Nations, local governments, and residents throughout the Basin since 2012 to learn what changes they would like to see in a modernized Treaty.\u00a0 Over 40 meetings have been held, primarily in communities affected by Treaty operations, including multiple meetings in Nakusp, Fauquier and Burton.\u00a0 Public consultation reports from <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2017\/01\/Columbia-River-Treaty-Review-Public-Consultation-Report-_March-2014.pdf\">2014<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2018\/12\/6482_Columbia-River-Treaty-Public-Engagement_Report_Draft3.pdf\">2018<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2020\/07\/2019-CRT-Community-Meetings-Report_Web-FINAL_updated.pdf\">2019<\/a> outline what was heard in each community visited.<\/p><p>In addition, the B.C. Treaty Team connects regularly with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee<\/a>, which was formed to seek refinements to the Treaty and to address existing domestic issues to improve the quality of life for Basin residents.\u00a0 Nakusp Councilor, Aidan McLaren-Caux, is currently a member and former Mayor of Nakusp, Karen Hamling, was Co-Chair of the committee before she retired and advocated strongly for the interests in Nakusp.\u00a0 Mayor Zeleznik has also shared the interests and concerns of Nakusp residents with the B.C.\u00a0 Treaty Team.<\/p><p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-basin-regional-advisory-committee\/\">Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee<\/a>, which is helping inform future improvements to the Treaty and regional hydro operations, has representation from Basin communities impacted by the Treaty operations, including citizen <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/03\/CBRAC_MemberList_2024.pdf\">members<\/a> from Nakusp, Revelstoke and Castlegar.<\/p><p>The B.C. Treaty Team also connects with people through virtual public meetings, social media, emails, phone calls, and letters, and have heard from many residents around Arrow Lakes.<\/p><p>Everything the B.C. Treaty Team has heard over the years (and continues to hear) is informing what improvements are being sought in a modernized the Treaty.<\/p><p>Updates on Treaty negotiations, news about engagement opportunities, and recordings and reports from past engagement sessions are available on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/\">Province of B.C. Treaty website<\/a> and shared through <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ColumbiaRiverTreaty\">Facebook<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CRTreaty\">Twitter\/X<\/a>, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/sign-up\/\">B.C. Treaty newsletter<\/a>.<\/p><p><strong>118.\u00a0 In the original agreement between BC Hydro and the flooded community residents was that these communities would have free water. Why did BC Hydro transfer responsibility to the RDCK, who then started charging residents for water?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro: <\/strong>In 2010, the water systems in Burton, Edgewood, Fauquier, and Robson were transferred from BC Hydro to the Regional District of Central Kootenay.\u00a0 The transfers were agreed to by area residents through four separate referendums in each service area, and a supporting vote of 50% +1 was required to finalize the transfer of each community water system.\u00a0 As part of the transfer, BC Hydro contributed $2 million in capital reserve funding to support future system upgrades.\u00a0 BC Hydro also committed to pay water rates on behalf of existing eligible customers until their properties transfer by any method to a new owner and continues to pay the water rates on behalf of existing community facilities in perpetuity.<\/p><p><strong>119.\u00a0 Are the aerial photos accessible to the public and where can they be viewed?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The aerial images taken in 2023 will not be made public as they will likely contain sensitive or private information as it relates to private properties due to the level of detail that has been captured and is therefore not appropriate for BC Hydro to share publicly.\u00a0 These images will only be made available to third parties under data sharing agreements to assist with identifying the locations of remaining structures and materials on the reservoir and fish stranding locations.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>120.\u00a0 Will you be sending us a link to the recorded meeting?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>The recording was emailed to everyone who registered for the information session on October 20, 2023.\u00a0 It is also posted, along with materials from the information session and this report, on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/2023\/10\/18\/low-levels-in-arrow-lakes-reservoir\/\">Province of B.C. Columbia River Treaty website<\/a>.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10087\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10087\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10087\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Compensation for communities affected by low levels on Arrow Lakes Reservoir<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10087\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>104.\u00a0 I am very concerned about a downward trend in water levels as it takes longer and longer to refill the reservoir in drier and drier seasons. \u00a0Are there any plans to specifically compensate the communities on the Arrow Lakes reservoir for the economic impact of lower water levels?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The low water levels in 2023 were due to severe drought conditions in the Columbia basin.\u00a0 It is important to recognize that the reservoirs will see operations at the upper and lower limits of the licensed operating range based on weather, inflows, and other variables.<\/p><p>BC Hydro is aware that the drought conditions in 2023 caused significant issues for the communities around Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Unfortunately, communities across the province have been impacted by this drought, including those that have been impacted by the related wildfires.\u00a0 There are no plans for compensation from BC Hydro for the communities on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><p><strong>105.\u00a0 Also are the Arrow Lakes going to be given more money from the Columbia Basin Trust, as again and as always in the past 60 years are the most affected and the least compensated?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from Columbia Basin Trust:<\/strong> Columbia Basin Trust was created as a way for an entire region that was negatively impacted by the Columbia River Treaty to share in some of the benefits of the Treaty.\u00a0 The Trust was not set up to provide compensation, but rather to focus on improving the social, economic and environmental well-being for present and future generations.\u00a0 The Trust does not receive downstream benefits from the Treaty.\u00a0 The Trust is a self-sustaining organization.<\/p><p><strong>106.\u00a0 Compensation to those affected should be a given and not overlooked any longer.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The low water levels in 2023 were due to severe drought conditions in the Columbia basin.\u00a0 It is important to recognize that the reservoirs will see operations at the upper and lower limits of the licensed operating range based on weather, inflows, and other variables.<\/p><p>BC Hydro is aware that the drought conditions in 2023 caused significant issues for the communities around Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Unfortunately, communities across the province have been impacted by this drought, including those that have been impacted by the related wildfires.\u00a0 There are no plans for compensation from BC Hydro for the communities on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><p><strong>107.\u00a0 When is there going to be a full review of all the terrible treatment of the landowners that got flooded out and given pennies on the dollar for their land value? When do they all get what they should have been paid, with interest?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Compensation settlements were reached at the time the Treaty was first created, almost 60 years ago.\u00a0 There are no plans to reopen them.<\/p><p><strong>108.\u00a0 Why do all those who benefited and were not flooded out get more attention than those who had their lives overturned?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>When the Treaty was first created, it impacted communities and ecosystems along the Columbia River.\u00a0 Treaty dams and reservoirs inundated 110,000 hectares (270,000 acres) of Canadian ecosystems, displaced more than 2,000 residents as well as Indigenous Nations, communities and infrastructure, and impacted agriculture, tourism and forestry activities in the Columbia Basin.<\/p><p>Columbia Basin Trust was created as a way for an entire region that was so negatively impacted by the Columbia River Treaty to share in some of the benefits of the Treaty.\u00a0 The Trust was not set up to provide compensation, but rather to focus on improving the social, economic and environmental well-being for present and future generations.\u00a0 The Trust does not receive downstream benefits from the Treaty.\u00a0 The Trust is a self-sustaining organization.<\/p><p>That said, Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations recognize the past and ongoing impacts of the Treaty on the people and ecosystems of the Basin and are committed to negotiating an improved agreement that reflects the needs of the Basin now and into the future.\u00a0 While there was little to no consultation with Indigenous peoples or residents when the Treaty was first created, this time, residents in the Basin \u2013 in particular those directly impacted by the Treaty \u2013 are guiding what improvements are being sought by the Canadian team.<\/p><p>The B.C. Treaty Team does not consider that those communities that benefited from a reduction in flood risk are receiving greater attention.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10097\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10097\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10097\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Distribution of revenues from the Columbia River Treaty<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10097\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>109.\u00a0 The entitlement money should be staying in the affected areas to mitigate the issues created by the Treaty! Why is the rest of the Province of B.C. benefiting from our hardship? The money could be used to mitigate the fish stranding and the devastating damage to our ecosystem.<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>Revenues from the Canadian Entitlement are paid to the Province\u2019s general revenue fund which, through various ministry budgets, supports government programs and essential services in communities across the province, including those that mitigate environmental impacts.<\/p><p>Projects to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife populations in the Columbia River watershed impacted by BC Hydro dams will continue to be funded through the ongoing work of the Fish &amp; Wildlife Compensation Program delivered in partnership between First Nations, the Province, BC Hydro, and the public.<\/p><p><strong>110.\u00a0 You share a portion of $400 million with the Indigenous Nations but what about the residents that live here that are not Indigenous? Do the communities living in the basin not count?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team: <\/strong>Columbia Basin communities broadly benefit from the Columbia Basin Trust, which was created in 1995 in recognition of the Treaty\u2019s impacts.\u00a0 The Province has invested over half a billion dollars in the Columbia Basin Trust and Columbia Power Corporation since the Trust\u2019s inception.\u00a0 The Trust has invested this endowment wisely, including in hydropower projects in the Basin, and is now a self-sustaining organization.\u00a0 In 2022\/23, the Trust delivered a total of $82.2 million in direct benefits to the region.<\/p><p>The interim agreements between the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations and the Province of B.C. to share revenue generated from the Treaty are part of B.C.\u2019s broader commitment to co-develop a new fiscal framework and new revenue sharing mechanisms with Indigenous Peoples that supports the self determination of Indigenous governments.\u00a0 These interim revenue-sharing agreements specifically address the impacts the Treaty has had to Indigenous rights and title as guaranteed by section 35 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution.<\/p><p><strong>111.\u00a0 Can you explain why communities that were not impacted by the initial flooding and are not impacted by the rising and falling water levels receive CBT grant money? And why most of them receive significantly more grant money than the impacted communities?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from Columbia Basin Trust: <\/strong>Columbia Basin Trust was created in recognition of the impacts of the Columbia River Treaty to support the efforts of the people in the Canadian portion of the Columbia River Basin, the region most impacted by the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 The Trust was not set up to provide compensation to specific communities, but rather to focus on improving the social, economic and environmental well-being for present and future generations of the region.\u00a0 In 2022\/23, the Trust delivered a total of $82.2 million in direct benefits to the region.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2736\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2736\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2736\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2736\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Either Canada or the US can unilaterally terminate most of the provisions of the Columbia River Treaty anytime after September 16, 2024, providing at least ten years\u2019 notice is given.<\/p><p>The latest date to provide termination notice for September 2024 was September 2014.<\/p><p>Government agencies in both Canada and the United States have examined\u00a0future Columbia River Treaty options. The Ministry of Energy and Mines Columbia River Treaty Review Team is leading the Province\u2019s Review.<\/p><p>Between 2012 -2014, the Review Team conducted\u00a0an analysis of the economic, environmental, social, financial, legal and hydrological impacts of the Columbia River Treaty in order to make a comprehensive decision on continuation, amendment or termination of the Treaty. Consultations with Columbia River Basin residents and First Nations were conducted. The Province also sought to\u00a0understand United States\u2019 interests.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2756\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2756\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2756\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Why is British Columbia leading the Columbia River Treaty Review?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2756\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Canada-British Columbia Agreement (1963) transferred most Columbia River Treaty benefits, rights and obligations to the Province.<\/p><p>The Columbia River Treaty and related responsibilities and obligations for Canada and British Columbia are as follows:<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Columbia River Treaty<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Non-Treaty<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"5\"><h5><strong>British Columbia<\/strong><\/h5><\/td><td>Recipient of Treaty Benefits, responsible for Treaty obligations<\/td><td>Licensing water users<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Responsible for management of Treaty reservoirs<\/td><td>Water quality standards<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Owner of BC Hydro (Canadian Entity) and power generation<\/td><td>Regulation of power generation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Impact mitigation<\/td><td>Management of natural resources<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Nominates a member of Permanent Engineering Board, which reviews and reports on operations under the Treaty<\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"3\"><h5><strong>Canada<\/strong><\/h5><\/td><td>Signatory to Treaty<\/td><td>Trans-boundary waters<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Approval of changes to Treaty<\/td><td>Canada-US relations<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Appoint Canadian Permanent Engineering Board members<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2766\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2766\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2766\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Who negotiates international treaties like the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2766\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>International treaties like the Columbia River Treaty are within the jurisdiction of the federal government. The Canada-British Columbia Agreement (1963) allocated most Columbia River Treaty rights, benefits and obligations to the Province.<\/p><p>The Canada \u2013 British Columbia Agreement requires Canada to obtain the concurrence of the Province before amending or terminating the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p><p>British Columbia and Canada have, and continue, to work very closely to ensure that any changes to the Treaty are in the best interests of Canadians and British Columbians.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2771\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2771\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2771\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Why are the dates 2014 and 2024 important?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2771\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty has no specified expiration date. Either Canada or the United States can unilaterally terminate the Columbia River Treaty any time after 16 September 2024, provided written notice is filed at least 10 years in advance. On or before September 16, 2014 was the earliest either party could give 10 years\u2019 notice.<\/p><p>Both British Columbia and the United States are considering options to determine whether or not to give notice. Regardless of this, Assured Annual Flood Control expires automatically in 2024 and converts in 2024 to a Called Upon operation of Canadian storage space as may be needed by the United States for flood risk management.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10107\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10107\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10107\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Fauquier-Needles Bridge<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10107\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>112.\u00a0 Why can the Canadian Entitlement not be used to build the promised bridge at Needles?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Where is our promised Fauquier Bridge?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> The decision on building a bridge between Fauquier and Needles is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.\u00a0 We understand the Ministry assessed the feasibility of building a bridge and decided not to pursue that option.\u00a0 This issue has been raised before during the Province\u2019s public engagement on the Columbia River Treaty and residents have been divided on this issue.\u00a0 Some want a bridge and others do not, in order to prevent increased traffic through and to communities along Arrow Lakes.\u00a0 It\u2019s important to note that the idea of a Fauquier-Needles bridge is not part of the Columbia River Treaty, or a condition of it.\u00a0 Those interested in pursuing this further can contact the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10117\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10117\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-10117\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Adapting to climate change<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-10117\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p><strong>113.\u00a0 Reality of global drought is happening. The future is not looking good.\u00a0 Are we pushing the issue as hard as we need to?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from <\/strong><strong>the <\/strong><strong>B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Where the Treaty is concerned, incorporating adaptive management and securing additional flexibility for B.C. Treaty dam operations will help ensure we can adjust to the evolving impacts of changing climate, including droughts and floods, and other future unknowns.<\/p><p>More broadly, the Province of B.C. has set ambitious climate change goals supported by actions under the <a href=\"https:\/\/cleanbc.gov.bc.ca\/\">CleanBC<\/a> initiative.\u00a0 To meet these goals, more electricity is needed instead of fossil fuels to power B.C.\u2019s economy and lives.\u00a0 BC Hydro\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bchydro.com\/toolbar\/about\/strategies-plans-regulatory\/supply-operations\/long-term-electricity-planning\/clean-power-2040\/integrated-resource-plan.html\">Integrated Resource Plan<\/a> includes a number of actions to increase electricity supply, including a <a href=\"https:\/\/news.gov.bc.ca\/releases\/2023EMLI0036-000941\">call for power<\/a> expected to launch this spring.\u00a0 Most recently, the Province <a href=\"https:\/\/news.gov.bc.ca\/releases\/2024EMLI0002-000049\">announced<\/a> a significant increase in funding to build out B.C.\u2019s electricity system over the next 10 years to meet growing electricity demand.<\/p><p><strong>114.\u00a0 If the current climate changes have had such a significant impact on electricity production, how can the current government continue to push an agenda of increased electricity consumption, such as electric vehicles?<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro and the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> To meet the Province\u2019s ambitious climate change goals, more clean electricity is needed instead of fossil fuels to power B.C.\u2019s economy and lives.\u00a0 BC Hydro\u2019s Electrification Plan supports the Province\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/cleanbc.gov.bc.ca\/\">CleanBC<\/a> goals to reduce emissions and drive economic development while keeping rates low for customers.<\/p><p>Greenhouse gas emissions per person in B.C. have been steadily increasing since 2015.\u00a0 Energy use is a key driver of the increase in greenhouse gas emissions.\u00a0 The largest emitting sectors in B.C. are transportation at 37 per cent of emissions, oil and gas production at 22 per cent, and heavy industries (including smelting, cement, and chemicals) at 14 per cent.\u00a0 Using clean electricity in place of fossil fuels provides us with an opportunity and a solution to lessen our impact on climate change.<\/p><p>BC Hydro\u2019s Integrated Resource Plan includes a number of actions to increase electricity supply from a variety of sources, including wind and solar.\u00a0 There is a <a href=\"https:\/\/news.gov.bc.ca\/releases\/2023EMLI0036-000941\">call for power<\/a> expected to launch in spring 2024.<\/p><p>In addition, the Province recently <a href=\"https:\/\/news.gov.bc.ca\/releases\/2024EMLI0002-000049\">announced<\/a> a significant increase in capital funding to meet growing electricity demand resulting from implementation of the CleanBC initiative.\u00a0 BC Hydro\u2019s updated 10-year capital plan, Power Pathway: Building BC\u2019s energy future, includes almost $36 billion in community and regional infrastructure investments throughout the province that will deliver clean, affordable electricity to people and businesses in the future.<\/p><p><strong>115.\u00a0 Thank-you all for your time and information thus far. If I heard correctly, while it is not possible to predict the future, the expectation is that the 2023 conditions may continue into 2024, perhaps longer. \u00a0If that is the case, what can local residents expect in terms of support next year to mitigate the impact on local tourism caused by the lack of access to beaches and boat launches etc.?\u00a0 Is there a long-term plan to address these issues if drought conditions are more common?<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>Answer from BC Hydro:<\/strong> The low water levels in 2023 were due to severe drought conditions in the Columbia basin.\u00a0 It is important to recognize that the reservoirs will see operations at the upper and lower limits of the licensed operating range based on weather, inflows, and other variables.<\/p><p>BC Hydro is aware that the drought conditions in 2023 caused significant issues for the communities around Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Unfortunately, communities across the province have been impacted by this drought, including those that have been impacted by the related wildfires.\u00a0 There are no plans for compensation from BC Hydro for the communities on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.<\/p><p><strong>Answer from the B.C. Columbia River Treaty Team:<\/strong> Looking to the future, B.C. is seeking improvements in the Columbia River Treaty through negotiations with the U.S. to reduce the type of impacts seen on Arrow Lakes over the past year, and since the Treaty was brought into force.\u00a0 The additional flexibility the Canadian negotiation delegation is aiming for would allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.\u00a0 There is river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of this involves looking at different elevations throughout the year on Arrow Lakes Reservoir.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for this modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>The Canadian delegation is also looking to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11057\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11057\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11057\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What does the agreement-in-principle include?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11057\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty has played a crucial role in reducing flood damage and providing clean energy to millions of households, businesses and industries in both Canada and the United States. These remain important elements of the agreement-in-principle (AIP). Under the AIP, countries have agreed that a modernized Treaty will provide a reduced level of assured pre-planned flood risk management and continued cooperation on hydropower generation for the Columbia River.<\/p><p>The countries have also agreed to incorporate new provisions not considered in the original agreement, including those for increased unilateral flexibility for how B.C. operates its Treaty dams, ecosystem health and Indigenous cultural values, salmon population enhancement and reintroduction in the Canadian Upper Columbia Basin, adaptive management, new collaborative engagement on Kootenay river management, including Libby Dam operations and a Columbia River system-wide transboundary joint ecosystem and Indigenous and Tribal cultural values body.<\/p><p>These added provisions reflect the interests voiced by B.C. Columbia Basin First Nations, local governments, and residents over more than a decade of engagement with the Province of British Columbia.<\/p><p>The AIP supports a renewed approach to sharing benefits equitably between countries. It enables B.C. to continue receiving an equitable share of additional hydroelectric power potential in the U.S. as a result of how B.C. operates its Treaty dams, and includes new access to U.S. transmission infrastructure. It also provides annual indexed compensation from the U.S. for a reduced volume of reservoir space for flood risk management and for other benefits the U.S. receives, including benefits to irrigation, navigation, recreation, and fish population enhancements in the U.S. portion of the Columbia Basin.<\/p><p>It\u2019s important to note that the agreement-in-principle is not the new Treaty and is not legally binding. It is a framework that provides a clear roadmap for the countries to draft a modernized Treaty.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2608\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2608\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2608\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2608\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty is a trans-boundary water management agreement between the United States and Canada signed in 1961 and ratified in 1964.<\/p><p>The Treaty optimizes flood management and power generation, requiring coordinated operations of reservoirs and water flows for the Columbia River and Kootenay River on both sides of the border.<\/p><p>It does not have a specified end date and if either party wishes to terminate the Treaty it requires at least 10 years\u2019 notice (on or before September 16, 2014 was\u00a0the earliest either party could give 10 years\u2019 notice).<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2681\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2681\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2681\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What are the Canadian and U.S. Entities?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2681\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The U.S. Entity is made up of the Bonneville Power Administration and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The Canadian Entity is BC Hydro.<\/p><p>The Columbia River Treaty is implemented by the entities. Together, they work cooperatively and are responsible for the daily operations of the reservoirs and hydroelectric facilities.<\/p><p>The Province of British Columbia is the Canadian Entity to manage the Canadian Entitlement, Canada\u2019s half share of the downstream power benefits.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11171\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11171\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11171\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How is the agreement-in-principle different from the original Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11171\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>In the AIP the combination of B.C. providing less assured flood risk management to the U.S., and gaining new flexibility for operating its Treaty dams, will give B.C. more control over Treaty flows and reservoir levels for B.C.\u2019s domestic purposes in order to better support B.C. Basin ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests.<\/p><p>The goal in these negotiations has always been to modernize the Treaty in a way that leads to improvements and reduced impacts in the B.C. Basin, and the AIP outlines a path to achieving that goal.<\/p><p>The original Treaty\u2019s main focus is limited to Flood Risk Management and hydropower coordination.\u00a0 The AIP has expanded the scope of a modernized Treaty to include salmon population enhancement and salmon reintroduction, a transboundary joint ecosystem body to advise the countries on ecology health of the \u201cOne River\u201d Columbia, an adaptive management framework, and a new collaborative committee on the management of the Kootenay system, including Libby Dam, to address common interests.<\/p><p>The presentation from the Province of B.C.\u2019s virtual information session on September 17, 2024 compares the AIP with a scenario under which the original Treaty continues.\u00a0 View the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/09\/AIP_PublicInfoSession_slides.pdf\">PowerPoint slides<\/a>\u00a0or watch a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/FmBedYBfeNQ?si=5XVhZ4qETkd71yuR\">recording of the information session<\/a>.<\/p><p>It is important to note that the agreement-in-principle is not a finalized modernized Treaty.\u00a0 It provides an agreed upon roadmap for the negotiation teams to move forward on drafting a modernized Treaty and for B.C. to begin engaging with the Columbia River Basin residents to seek feedback on the AIP and on next steps.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11181\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11181\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11181\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Is the agreement-in-principle available to the public?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11181\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>At the outset of the negotiations, Canada and the U.S. concurred, as is usually done in international negotiations, that they would treat information developed and exchanged in the context of negotiations in confidence to preserve respective positions and strategies. \u00a0The AIP framework reached during negotiations is subject to this treatment.<\/p><p>That said, B.C. has provided <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/09\/CRT-AIP-Canada-public-description-Final_2024Aug30.pdf\">a document containing the main elements<\/a> of what is intended to become a modernized Columbia River Treaty. \u00a0Representatives from the Canadian negotiation delegation described these elements and answered questions during\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/FmBedYBfeNQ?si=5XVhZ4qETkd71yuR\">a virtual information session<\/a> held on September 17, 2024.<\/p><p>B.C. has also released a backgrounder and a video describing these elements as further ways to learn about the AIP.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2686\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2686\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2686\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What are the benefits and impacts to British Columbia from the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2686\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Columbia River Treaty Benefits and Impacts are outlined in the 2012 report <em><a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2012\/07\/A-Review-of-the-Range-of-Impacts-and-Benefits-of-the-Columbia-River-Treaty6.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A Review of the Range of Impacts and Benefits of the Columbia River Treaty on Basin Communities, the Region and the Province<\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11191\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11191\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11191\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">When will a new Treaty come into effect?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11191\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>That is still to be determined.\u00a0 Now that Canada and the U.S. have reached an AIP, there is still work to be done.\u00a0\u00a0B.C.&#8217;s first priority was to engage with the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations, Columbia Basin local governments and Basin residents about the agreement-in-principle and this process is still underway.<\/p><p>There are other processes that need to take place on both sides of the border, including drafting of the Treaty text, seeking First Nations\u2019 consent, obtaining approval by the B.C. government, and ratification by the U.S. and Canadian federal governments.<\/p><p>There is no set date for when a modernized Treaty will come into effect.<\/p><p>While the AIP is a significant step towards a modernized Treaty and lays out the foundation for what a renewed Treaty will include, it does not mean river and reservoir management will change right away.\u00a0 Until a modernized Treaty has been finalized and brought into law, the current Treaty remains in place.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2691\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2691\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2691\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What flood control is provided under the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2691\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty prescribes two main types of flood risk management:<\/p><p>1 \u2013 Assured Annual Flood Control<\/p><p>Canada agreed to provide 8.45 million acre feet (increased to 8.95 million acre feet in 1995 due to a reallocation of storage from Arrow to Mica) of assured annual water storage for flood control purposes for 60 years at the three Treaty reservoirs [Duncan, Arrow Lakes (Keenleyside), and Kinbasket]. This expires automatically in 2024.<\/p><p>2 \u2013 On Call Flood Control<\/p><p>On Call Flood Control is intended to be used during periods of very high water inflows. Under certain specified conditions the United States can request that Canada provide On Call storage in addition to the Assured Annual Flood Control to prevent flooding. In this event, Canada would provide extra storage above and beyond the assured 8.95 million acre feet\u00a0at Canadian reservoirs.<\/p><p>For each request the United States must pay the operating costs and any B.C. economic loss. This provision remains in effect as long as the Columbia River Treaty dams exist, even if the Columbia River Treaty is terminated.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2701\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2701\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2701\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What are downstream benefits?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2701\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>As a result of the water flow management from B.C. storage reservoirs additional power can be generated in the United States. This power, is downstream power benefits. Downstream power benefits are computer modeled and calculated using procedures set out in the Treaty and are defined six years in advance. They are not calculated based on actual amount of downstream power generated. These benefits are shared equally between both countries.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11201\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11201\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11201\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Why have negotiations to modernize the Treaty taken so long?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11201\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Negotiations have taken time because there are many interests to consider in B.C., Canada and in the U.S.\u00a0 Both countries have taken the time needed to improve on a 60-year-old Treaty in need of renewal.\u00a0 There were several stages to this process: reaching a common understanding among each member of the negotiation delegations of the original Treaty, its operations and challenges; sharing each country\u2019s goals and objectives; laying out specific interests across a range of topics; developing, introducing and revisiting respective positions; and exchanging more than a dozen proposals.<\/p><p>For the Canadian team, that means negotiating an agreement that reflects the interests and values of the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations, local governments and residents, which are captured in the agreement-in-principle reached in July 2024.\u00a0 There have been comprehensive technical studies, computerized river management modelling, and over a decade of engagement that has informed this process.<\/p><p>Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations have been clear with the U.S. that a modernized Treaty must reduce the impacts that B.C. Basin communities and ecosystems have been experiencing since the Treaty came into force in 1964.\u00a0 B.C. is not willing to accept an agreement unless it allows for improvements in the B.C. Basin.<\/p><p>It is important to note that the agreement-in-principle is not a finalized modernized Treaty.\u00a0 It provides an agreed upon roadmap for the negotiation teams to move forward on drafting a renewed Treaty and for B.C. to engage with the Columbia River Basin residents to seek feedback on the AIP and on next steps.\u00a0 Until a modernized Treaty is ratified, the existing Treaty remains in effect.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11211\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11211\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11211\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How will the agreement-in-principle benefit the B.C. Columbia Basin?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11211\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>If the Treaty is modernized in a way that reflects the agreement-in-principle, the combination of reduced pre-planned flood risk management and new Canadian flexibility would give B.C. more control over its Treaty dam operations and resulting river flows and reservoir levels to address impacts to ecosystems and communities.<\/p><p>Following the modernized Treaty\u2019s entry into force, Canada will provide the United States with 3.6 million acre-feet (MAF) of pre-planned flood risk management (FRM), a 60% reduction from the current 8.95 MAF.\u00a0 Arrow Lakes Reservoir would continue to provide the 3.6 MAF of FRM storage as it is the closest reservoir to the border and therefore the most effective in responding to the Columbia freshet; however, Kinbasket and Duncan Reservoirs would no longer need to be operated to meet planned U.S. FRM requirements.<\/p><p>The new Canadian flexibility under the AIP would allow Canada to unilaterally decide to reduce the current coordinated power storage of 15.5 MAF by up to 5 MAF, or almost a third of the Treaty storage space, for B.C.\u2019s own domestic purposes. \u00a0Domestic flexibility may be used to address impacts resulting from the Treaty to ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values and socio-economic interests.<\/p><p>There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how B.C. can best manage this new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different flows and elevations throughout the year on Treaty reservoirs and river sections.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives and operational scenarios for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>Once options for changes in Treaty hydrosystem operations using the new flexibility are identified, B.C. will hold a separate public engagement process with Basin communities to get their feedback.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2706\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2706\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2706\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Canadian Entitlement?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2706\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Canada\u2019s half-share of the downstream power benefits is called the Canadian Entitlement. Under the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2012\/04\/Can-BC-Agreement-July-8-1963.pdf\">1963 Canada-British Columbia Agreement<\/a>, these benefits are owned by the Province of British Columbia.<\/p><p>Under the Columbia River Treaty, the United States provides the Canadian Entitlement to British Columbia as energy and capacity, not money. Over the last ten years (2000-2010) the average annual Canadian Entitlement has been approximately 1320 megawatts capacity (about 11% of BC Hydro\u2019s total capacity) and approximately 4540 gigawatt hours of energy.<\/p><p>Powerex sells the Canadian Entitlement at market value to either BC Hydro or utilities in Alberta or United States.<\/p><p>When the Columbia River Treaty was ratified in 1964, the Province of British Columbia sold the first 30 years of the Canadian Entitlement to a consortium of utilities in the United States for $254 million and used the money to finance the construction of the three Columbia River Treaty dams. Those agreements expired in phases (1998-2003) and the Province now receives all of the Canadian Entitlement. The Canadian Entitlement is worth approximately $120 million annually, depending on power market prices, and goes into the Province\u2019s general revenue account.<\/p><p>The Canadian Entitlement continues as long as the Columbia River Treaty is in place. If the Columbia River Treaty is terminated, the Canadian Entitlement ends.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2711\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2711\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2711\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How has the United States benefitted from the Columbia River Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2711\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Canadian Columbia River Treaty reservoir storage reduces flood flows in the United States and increases generation at United States hydroelectric projects by reducing spill and shifting energy generation to high value time periods, providing billions of dollars of power benefits.<\/p><p>Columbia River Treaty dams more than doubled the amount of Columbia River basin reservoir storage. Canadian reservoir storage reduces the need to make use of reservoirs at United States\u2019 dams to manage spring flood risks, fish protection and other needs. For an overview of the benefits to the United States from the Columbia River Treaty see:\u00a0<a href=\"\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2012\/07\/US-Benefits-from-CRT-June-20-13-2.pdf\">U.S. Benefits from the Columbia River Treaty \u2013 Past, Present and Future: A Province of British Columbia Perspective<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11221\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11221\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11221\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Will public input make a difference if negotiating teams are already drafting a modernized Treaty?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11221\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Legal drafting of a modernized Treaty will take time.\u00a0 We have been clear with the U.S. about our commitment to engage with Basin First Nations, local governments and residents so they can provide feedback on an AIP before a modernized Treaty is finalized.\u00a0 This commitment has been underway since the AIP was achieved as the B.C. CRT Team has been accepting input since September 2024.\u00a0 The feedback received is being considered by the Canadian negotiation delegation during the drafting process to modernize the Treaty.<\/p><p>People were invited to share their thoughts through an online feedback form and by formal written submissions until March 31, 2025. \u00a0That process is now closed; however, comments and questions about the Treaty and the AIP are welcomed by email to <a href=\"mailto:columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca\">columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca<\/a>.<\/p><p>In-person community meetings will be scheduled in the B.C. Columbia Basin to seek further feedback from residents.\u00a0 Those sessions, originally planned for early in 2025, will be confirmed once there is more clarity about next steps on the path to modernizing the Treaty. \u00a0Negotiations between Canada and the U.S. to modernize the Treaty are currently paused, as the U.S. administration conducts a broad review of its international engagements.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2716\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2716\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2716\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia Basin Trust?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2716\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia Basin Trust is a Crown corporation that was created in 1995 to support social, economic and environmental well-being in the Canadian portion of the Columbia River Basin \u2013 the region most affected by the Columbia River Treaty and the Columbia River Treaty dams.<\/p><p>In recognition of these impacts, the Province established the Columbia Basin Trust under the Columbia Basin Trust Act and provided an endowment of $321 million: $276 million to invest in hydroelectric projects, $45 million endowment to invest in other projects or for loans, as well as $2 million per year from 1996 to 2010 for operations.<\/p><p>The Columbia Basin Trust manages the endowment through its Investment Program which provides funding for its Delivery of Benefits activities. Currently, the Columbia Basin Trust provides over $50 million annually in support of the efforts of the people of the Columbia River Basin to create a legacy of social, economic, and environmental well-being and to achieve greater self-sufficiency for present and future generations.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11231\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11231\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11231\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How have Basin residents been engaged throughout the Treaty modernization process?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11231\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Province of B.C. has been engaging with First Nations, local governments and residents in the Basin since 2012 to learn what interests matter to them, and what they want to see changed in the Treaty.<\/p><p>The B.C. CRT Team has been connecting with people through virtual and in-person meetings, social media, newsletters, emails, letters and one-on-one phone calls with interested citizens.\u00a0 Members of the Canadian negotiating delegation, including Canada\u2019s Chief Negotiator and representatives from the Province of B.C. and Basin First Nations, attend public meetings to provide insight into the process for modernizing the Treaty, answer questions and hear from residents firsthand.<\/p><p>There are also two committees <span data-teams=\"true\">the B.C. CRT Team engages with<\/span> regularly \u2013 the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.crtlgc.ca\/\">\u00a0Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee<\/a>\u00a0and the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/columbia-basin-regional-advisory-committee\/\">Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee<\/a>.\u00a0 These groups have members from across the Basin and are providing suggestions, feedback and advice on what an improved Treaty could look like.<\/p><p>Engagement has continued since the AIP was reached. Resources have been provided that explain the AIP in various ways, including an overview video, backgrounder, and a more detailed document containing the content of the AIP.<\/p><p>B.C. hosted a series of virtual information sessions for the public to learn more about the AIP and ask questions. \u00a0Recordings of those sessions are available on the <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/agreement-in-principle\/\">B.C. Columbia River Treaty website<\/a>.<\/p><p>The CRT Team looks forward to returning to the Basin for in-person community meetings. \u00a0Those sessions, originally planned for early in 2025, will be confirmed once there is more clarity about next steps on the path to modernizing the Treaty. \u00a0Negotiations between Canada and the U.S. to modernize the Treaty are currently paused, as the U.S. administration conducts a broad review of its international engagements.<\/p><p>Questions and comments are encouraged and can be sent to <a href=\"mailto:columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca\">columbiarivertreaty@gov.bc.ca.<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2721\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2721\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2721\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia Power Corporation?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2721\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>In 1994, the Province formed the Columbia Power Corporation to hold expansion rights to both the Brilliant Dam and Waneta Dam purchased from Teck Cominco Metals Ltd.<\/p><p>British Columbia committed to provide $250 million over a ten-year period for the development of three power projects in the Columbia Basin, in partnership with Columbia Basin Trust.<\/p><p>These projects were: the addition of power generation at Hugh Keenleyside Dam, owned by BC Hydro, and the expansion of generating capacities at Brilliant Dam and Waneta Dam.<\/p><p>The partners purchased Brilliant Dam from Teck Cominco in 1996. The Columbia Power Corporation and Columbia Basin Trust partnership, along with FortisBC, completed the 335 MW Waneta Expansion Project.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-13667\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-13667\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-13667\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How are Basin residents\u2019 interests represented in the agreement-in-principle?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-13667\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Throughout the Province\u2019s public engagement, Basin residents and local governments have consistently voiced that they want a modernized Treaty that:<\/p><ul><li>continues to protect communities from damaging floods and enable the generation of clean renewable hydroelectricity;<\/li><li>supports ecosystem health throughout the Basin;<\/li><li>includes salmon restoration in the upper Columbia River;<\/li><li>respects Indigenous knowledge and cultural values;<\/li><li>considers social and economic interests such as recreation and transportation;<\/li><li>reduces Treaty reservoir fluctuations;<\/li><li>is able to adapt to future unknowns, such as the effects of climate change; and<\/li><li>includes transboundary coordination of Libby Dam operations.<\/li><\/ul><p>Residents have also voiced the need for First Nations\u2019 participation in Treaty modernization, and the need for a modernized Treaty to reflect an equitable sharing of Treaty benefits, including benefits to U.S. irrigation, navigation, recreation and fisheries.<\/p><p>These interests are all reflected in the AIP.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2726\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2726\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-2726\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What is the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-2726\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program compensates for the impacts to fish, wildlife and their supporting habitats affected by BC Hydro owned and operated generation facilities. The Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program is delivered through a joint partnership that includes BC Hydro, the Province and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.<\/p><p>Since 1995, the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program has invested about $4 million annually in fish and wildlife projects in the Columbia Region.<\/p><p>The approximately 600 conservation and enhancement projects are delivered with the support of partners including, First Nations, businesses, local communities and environmental groups and are approved each year by a regional steering committee.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11241\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11241\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11241\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How much say did First Nations have in the negotiations?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11241\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations are full participants in the Canadian negotiating team.\u00a0 Since 2018, when negotiations began, representatives of the three Nations have been working closely with the governments of Canada and B.C. to develop and refine Canadian negotiating positions, strategies and proposals.<strong>\u00a0 <\/strong>That partnership became more formalized when, in April 2019, then Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland invited representatives from the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc, and Syilx Okanagan Nations, to join the Canadian delegation as observers.<\/p><p>The three Nations have also been instrumental in leading domestic efforts to integrate Indigenous and Tribal cultural values and ecosystem health into the modernized Treaty, and restore salmon to the B.C. portion of the Columbia Basin.<\/p><p>The close partnership between Canada, B.C. and the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations throughout the past six years of negotiations with the U.S. has made it possible to reach this AIP. \u00a0The three Nations\u2019 direct involvement has made negotiations with the U.S. stronger and will ensure a modernized Treaty will reflect a broader range of interests and perspectives.<\/p><p>The participation of the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc, and Syilx Okanagan Nations as partners in the Columbia River Treaty modernization process is an important example of Canada&#8217;s and B.C.&#8217;s commitments to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and to our journey towards reconciliation.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11251\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11251\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11251\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Will management of the river and reservoirs change as a result of the AIP?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11251\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>While the AIP is a significant step towards a modernized Treaty and lays out the foundation for what a renewed Treaty may include, it does not mean river and reservoir management will change right away.\u00a0 Until a modernized Treaty has been finalized and brought into law, the current Treaty remains in place, with the addition of the reduced FRM in the AIP for a period of 3 years.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11261\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11261\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11261\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Does the AIP include provisions to keep water in B.C. during drought years?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11261\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Province is aware of the significant impacts that drought conditions have had on B.C. Treaty reservoirs in recent years, in addition to requirements to meet obligations under the Treaty.\u00a0 These impacts have been especially prevalent in Arrow Lakes Reservoir, affecting the area\u2019s communities and ecosystems.<\/p><p>While the AIP does not include specific provisions for holding water in B.C. during drought years, it does \u00a0include additional unilateral flexibility for how B.C.\u2019s Treaty dams are operated, which will allow B.C. to adjust operations to support ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic interests, such as recreation and tourism, without agreement from the U.S.<\/p><p>There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use any new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different elevations throughout the year on Treaty reservoirs.\u00a0 Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>While the AIP is a significant step towards a modernized Treaty and lays out the foundation for what a renewed Treaty may include, it does not mean river and reservoir management will change right away.\u00a0 Until a modernized Treaty has been finalized and brought into law, the current Treaty remains in place, with the addition of the reduced pre-planned flood risk management in the AIP for a period of 3 years.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11271\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11271\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11271\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How important has climate change been in the negotiations?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11271\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Climate change has been interwoven throughout Canada-U.S. negotiations.<\/p><p>Before negotiations started, two documents set the stage for the current discussions &#8211; the B.C. Decision and the U.S. Regional Recommendation on the Future of the Columbia River Treaty.\u00a0 Both documents addressed the need to consider climate change impacts in the Basin, so that has been a key consideration for negotiators from both countries.<\/p><p>Climate change is also an important part of research and modelling being led by First Nations, in collaboration with federal and provincial agencies and consultants, to explore ecosystem improvements in the B.C. Treaty reservoirs and along the Columbia River.<\/p><p>A key goal for the Canadian delegation throughout negotiations has been to incorporate adaptive management into the Treaty, allowing both countries to adjust to the effects of climate change (including droughts and floods), evolving Indigenous and scientific knowledge, and other future unknowns.\u00a0 This is reflected in the agreement-in-principle.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11281\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11281\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11281\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How does the agreement-in-principle support salmon?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11281\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The AIP outlines how Canada would provide 1 million acre-feet (MAF) of water flows in all years, and an additional 0.5 MAF in dry years, to support downstream salmon survival and migration.\u00a0 This will assist efforts in both countries to maintain and enhance salmon populations in the mid and lower Columbia, including the Okanagan salmon stocks.<\/p><p>First Nations in Canada and Tribes in the U.S. will coordinate their respective salmon reintroduction studies to prevent duplication of effort.\u00a0 The goal is to maximize synergies from efforts on both sides of the border and to facilitate information sharing.<\/p><p>B.C. First Nations, the Province and Canada, under the Columbia River Salmon Reintroduction Initiative, have been collaborating on salmon reintroduction for a number of years.\u00a0 For more information visit the Initiative\u2019s website at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.columbiariversalmon.ca\">www.columbiariversalmon.ca.<\/a><\/p><p>Canada and the U.S. will form an Indigenous-led advisory body that will provide recommendations on how Treaty and other hydro-system operations can better support ecosystems along the entire Columbia River, which will also serve as a forum for collaborating on salmon restoration.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11291\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11291\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11291\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What compensation does Canada receive under the agreement-in-principle?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11291\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>Annual payments will be made to Canada under the AIP:<\/p><ol><li>Pre-planned flood risk management (FRM) payments would be US$37.6 million annually indexed to inflation using the consumer price index (CPI), through 2044. These payments began in 2024 under an interim agreement reached between Canada and U.S. under the current Treaty, which brought into effect the FRM operations outlined in the AIP and corresponding payments to Canada for a period of three years.\u00a0 The original payment for flood control in 1964 was US$64.4 million for 60 years, which expired September 16, 2024.<\/li><li>The United States also recognizes that they receive additional benefits from the operation of Canadian Treaty reservoirs and will provide an additional US$16.6 million to Canada annually once the modernized agreement enters into force, indexed to inflation using the CPI, through 2044. The additional benefits include irrigation, recreation, navigation and fisheries.\u00a0 This additional compensation does not exist in the current Treaty.<\/li><\/ol><p>Canadian Entitlement (CE):<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">This is B.C.\u2019s share of the incremental power generation potential in the U.S. resulting from the management of Treaty reservoirs and is in the form of electricity delivered to the border.\u00a0 The CE is sold either domestically to BC Hydro or on the U.S. energy market, and revenues go to the Province\u2019s Consolidated Revenue Fund.<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">The schedule in the AIP that reduces the CE at the beginning of the 2024-2025 operating year (beginning Aug. 1, 2024), starts from 660 megawatts (MW) capacity and 305 average megawatts (aMW) of energy, stabilizing in 2033-2034 at 550 MW of capacity and 225 aMW of energy, and ending in 2044.\u00a0 The reduction of the CE takes into account the decrease expected when the Treaty was originally entered into due to a reduced contribution of Canadian Treaty dam operations to the Pacific Northwest power system capability. \u00a0The schedule is available in the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/app\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/09\/CRT-AIP-Canada-public-description-Final_2024Aug30.pdf\">document containing the content of the AIP<\/a>, posted to this website. \u00a0Coordination on hydropower operations and the delivery of the Canadian Entitlement outlined in the AIP was secured until 2044 through an <a href=\"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/interim-period-entity-agreements\/\">interim agreement<\/a> between Canada and the U.S. reached under the existing Treaty in the fall of 2024.<\/p><p>Transmission benefits:<\/p><ol><li>Existing transmission: BC Hydro will have access, through its trading subsidiary Powerex, to an unreduced 1,120 MW of transmission that is currently used to deliver the CE to the Canada-U.S. border.\u00a0 This maintains BC Hydro\u2019s ability to buy power in the U.S. market when prices are low to supplement BC Hydro\u2019s energy portfolio.\u00a0 This is particularly important for system stability and energy security during drought periods. \u00a0This transmission access was secured until 2044 through an interim agreement reached between the Canadian and U.S. Entities in the fall of 2024.<\/li><li>New transmission: Powerex and the Bonneville Power Administration are to conduct a study on expansion of new transmission in the south-east of B.C. \u00a0\u00a0If, as a result of the study, the U.S. pursues the development of the additional transmission, BC Hydro will have further access to U.S. markets to enhance trading and supplement domestic energy resources.<\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11301\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11301\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11301\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How long will the renewed Treaty last?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11301\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Columbia River Treaty is an evergreen agreement; it has no end date.\u00a0 However, either country can unilaterally terminate the Treaty if it issues a 10-year termination notice.<\/p><p>The AIP sets a time limit to certain elements of the modernized Treaty, such as power coordination and flood risk management and associated compensation, to 20 years.\u00a0 Modifications, amendments and extensions can be made if agreed to by both countries.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11311\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11311\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-11311\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">What are the Joint Ecosystem and Indigenous and Tribal Cultural Values Body (JEB) and the Kootenay\/Kootenai Transboundary Collaborative Workgroup (KTCW)?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-11311\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>These are collaborative committees that are intended to enhance the ecological health of the Columbia and Kootenay rivers, as well as, for the Kootenay, address other objectives such as recreation and tourism, flood control and power generation.\u00a0 These bodies are in the early forming stages, pending the ratification of a modernized Treaty, and more information will be provided as they evolve.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12592\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12592\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-12592\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How will the new Canadian flexibility be used?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12592\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The purpose of gaining up to 5 million acre-feet of flexibility is to enhance ecosystems, Indigenous cultural values, and socio-economic objectives.\u00a0 There is significant research and river management scenario modelling underway that is informing how best to use this new flexibility.\u00a0 Part of that process includes looking at different Treaty reservoir elevations and flows throughout the year.<\/p><p>Research to determine objectives for the modelling process is being led by the Ktunaxa, Secw\u00e9pemc and Syilx Okanagan Nations in collaboration with federal and provincial governments, the Columbia River Treaty Local Governments Committee, and environmental non-governmental scientists and technical consultants.<\/p><p>While the work is progressing well, alternative hydro system operations, known as Specified Operations (SO), are not yet fully developed. \u00a0Once this work is further advanced, there will be a separate engagement process in the Basin to explain what improvements are being planned in which areas, and to receive feedback. \u00a0Once the SO is determined, it will be integrated into Columbia River Treaty operation planning and must be implemented under the modernized Treaty.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12602\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12602\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-12602\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Why is the Canadian Entitlement being reduced?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12602\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The Canadian Entitlement (CE) volume is determined under formulas imbedded in the 1964 Treaty.\u00a0 It is the half-share of the increased power generating potential of the U.S. power system with and without Canadian storage.\u00a0 The impact of Canadian storage has always been forecast to decline over time as demand grows in the Pacific Northwest and new generation is added to meet that demand, therefore diminishing the proportional contribution of the Treaty dams to the Pacific Northwest power grid. \u00a0Depending on the assumptions used in the Treaty calculations, the CE could decline to zero at the end of the 2020s, or persist over the longer term at a lower level.<\/p><p>In the AIP, the CE volume is initially less than B.C. has received in recent years, but higher than expected in the outer years.\u00a0 The Entitlement calculations and the CE volumes included in the AIP are independent of how the U.S. chooses to operate its system (for example spilling water rather than generating power to assist in juvenile salmon migration).<\/p><p>The revenue B.C. receives from the CE is a function of the volume and prices in the Pacific Northwest power market, which vary seasonally and from year to year.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12612\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12612\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-12612\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">Why is Flood Risk Management storage only in Arrow Lakes Reservoir?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12612\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>The maximum amount of flood risk management (FRM) storage has been reduced from 8.95 million acre-feet (MAF) in all three dams to 3.6 MAF in Arrow, so less than what it was previously. \u00a0In addition, the full 3.6 MAF will not be required every year. \u00a0In the original Treaty, the FRM volume in Arrow Lakes Reservoir was 5.1 MAF.\u00a0 In recent years this storage allocation was reduced to 3.6 MAF as part of what is called the Arrow-Mica swap.\u00a0 This reduced FRM storage requirement for Arrow Lakes Reservoir has been preserved in the AIP.<\/p><p>Arrow Lakes Reservoir is closest to the Canada-U.S. border and the most effective in reducing flood risk, as opposed to storage in Kinbasket Reservoir, which is higher up in the Columbia River, or Duncan Dam, which has significantly less storage available. \u00a0Half of the inflow into Arrow Lakes Reservoir comes from the Arrow Lakes watershed downstream of Mica dam.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"panel panel-bcgov-faq card\"role=\"region\"><button role=\"button\" data-toggle=\"collapse\" data-parent=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09\" href=\"#faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12622\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12622\" ><div class=\"panel-heading card-header\" id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-heading-12622\" ><h3 class=\"panel-title\">How will the Columbia River be managed until a modernized Treaty is brought into force?<\/h3><div class=\"panel-heading-arrow\"><i class=\"fa fa-chevron-down\"><\/i><\/div><\/div><\/button><div id=\"faq_6ada54716ab09-collapse-12622\" class=\"panel-collapse collapse\" role=\"region\" aria-hidden=\"true\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"panel-body card-body\"><p>To bridge the gap between the AIP and a modernized Treaty, the Canadian Entity (BC Hydro) and U.S. Entity (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bonneville Power Administration) entered into interim arrangements under the existing Treaty through exchanges of diplomatic notes between Canada and the U.S. to allow continued operations and implement some components of the AIP.<\/p><p>Under the interim agreements:<\/p><ul><li>Coordination on hydropower operations and the delivery of the Canadian Entitlement outlined in the AIP will continue until 2044, or until the agreement is superseded by a modernized Treaty entering into force, as will rights to transmission in the U.S.<\/li><\/ul><ul><li>The pre-planned flood risk management operations outlined in the AIP will be implemented for a three-year period and B.C. will be compensated as set out in the AIP.\u00a0 After the three-year period, unless a modernized Treaty is reached or the interim agreement is extended, flood risk management operations revert to a &#8216;Called Upon&#8217; regime, which would require the U.S. to make effective use of their reservoirs to manage flood risk, drafting them more deeply and frequently, before &#8220;calling upon&#8221; Canada for additional storage to prevent flooding.\u00a0 The U.S. would be required to compensate Canada for financial impacts and economic losses linked to the foregone use of reservoir space during the flood period.<\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following is a list of frequently asked questions regarding the Columbia River Treaty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2005","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2005"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2005\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2010,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2005\/revisions\/2010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engage.gov.bc.ca\/columbiarivertreaty\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}